2019
DOI: 10.1111/psj.12340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Policy feedback refers to the variety of ways in which existing policies can shape key aspects of politics and policymaking. Originating in historical institutionalism, the study of policy feedback has expanded to address resource and interpretative effects on target populations and mass publics, the roles of policy elites, and how feedback effects are conditioned by policy designs and larger institutional contexts. Recently, more attention has also been paid to feedback effects that are not self‐reinforcing i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These puzzling discrepancies, we argue, can be explained by the political dynamics of issue framing in climate policy implementation, through interpretive feedback effects. Drawing on policy feedback and framing literatures (Chong andDruckman 2007, Béland andSchlager 2019) and prospect theory (Tversky and Kahneman 1981), we show that the publics' perceptions of gains and losses during implementation act as an intervening mechanism to explain policy durability. Policy designs, including the communication and framing efforts of government actors, can provide an opportunity for elite supporters to generate different 'gain frames,' increasing the salience of the ongoing benefits of a policy among the general public, dampening voters' desire for policy retrenchment (Levin et al 2012, Lachapelle 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These puzzling discrepancies, we argue, can be explained by the political dynamics of issue framing in climate policy implementation, through interpretive feedback effects. Drawing on policy feedback and framing literatures (Chong andDruckman 2007, Béland andSchlager 2019) and prospect theory (Tversky and Kahneman 1981), we show that the publics' perceptions of gains and losses during implementation act as an intervening mechanism to explain policy durability. Policy designs, including the communication and framing efforts of government actors, can provide an opportunity for elite supporters to generate different 'gain frames,' increasing the salience of the ongoing benefits of a policy among the general public, dampening voters' desire for policy retrenchment (Levin et al 2012, Lachapelle 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…To conclude, the proliferation of new work on the mechanisms, directions, and effects of policy feedback is welcome (for reviews, see Béland 2010;Béland and Schlager 2019;Campbell 2012;Jordan and Matt 2014;Mettler and SoRelle 2014). A more active consideration of the dependent variable in this research should, we think, be a priority.…”
Section: Conclusion and New Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analysen knytter an til forskningslitteraturen om «policy feedback», en tradisjon som har et saerlig fortrinn når det gjelder å identifisere mekanismer som har formet fedrekvotepolitikken. Denne litteraturen retter seg mot å forstå hvordan reformer og eksisterende politikk kan ha tilbakevirkende effekt på politikkens videre utforming (Béland & Schlager, 2019). I Norge har fedrekvoten helt fra starten vaert omstridt og har vaert en viktig markør i familiepolitiske motsetninger mellom venstre-og høyresiden (Ellingsaeter, 2016).…”
Section: Innledningunclassified
“…Et lavere politisk konfliktnivå ga liten grunn til å vente en omfattende debatt. Men som også vist til i litteraturen kan interessegrupper bidra til å destabilisere «post-reform»-politikk (Béland & Schlager, 2019). Lengre fedrekvote hadde stor konkret betydning for blivende foreldre, og reformens raske gjennomføring bidro til å høyne naerhetseffekten av reformen kraftig.…”
Section: Fedrekvotepolitikkens Dynamikk -Vedvarende Spenningerunclassified