2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the fate and biological effects of sulfamethoxazole, norfloxacin and doxycycline in different vegetable–soil systems following manure application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Kong et al ( 2006 ) observed that the substrate utilization pattern changed significantly with increasing concentrations of oxytetracycline. In contrast, doxycycline application had a general positive effect on the utilization of substrates (Wang et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Kong et al ( 2006 ) observed that the substrate utilization pattern changed significantly with increasing concentrations of oxytetracycline. In contrast, doxycycline application had a general positive effect on the utilization of substrates (Wang et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cefuroxime is slowly eliminated from soils and 42.8–80% of the initial dose was degraded within 64 days under aerobic conditions. Other studies also confirmed that the soil properties and additional compounds, such as slurry, manure or sewage, have a significant effect on the bioavailable fraction and degradation of antibiotics in different soils (Hammesfahr et al, 2008 ; Pan and Chu, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Also, Liu et al [58] observed a short-term decrease in the usage of carbohydrates and miscellaneous by the analyzed microbial community in soil treated with sulfamethoxazole. In contrast, the application of doxycycline generally contributed to a stimulation of the substrate utilization [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%