2002
DOI: 10.1134/1.1511774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of the reflection coefficient of semiconductors in a wavelength range from 0.2 to 20 μm under the action of ultrasonic waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where W ph is an intensity of the illumination light, R -reflection coefficient, β -quantum Reduction of the reflection coefficient of the silicon surface due to the acoustostimulated diffusion of phosphorus into the semiconductor's depth was observed in [2]. Phenomenon of dynamic growth of L n induced by the ultrasound field was observed in work [9], this phenomenon being connected with reorientation of the complexes of defects, which include boron atoms, and with corresponding decrease of the carriers capture cross-section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where W ph is an intensity of the illumination light, R -reflection coefficient, β -quantum Reduction of the reflection coefficient of the silicon surface due to the acoustostimulated diffusion of phosphorus into the semiconductor's depth was observed in [2]. Phenomenon of dynamic growth of L n induced by the ultrasound field was observed in work [9], this phenomenon being connected with reorientation of the complexes of defects, which include boron atoms, and with corresponding decrease of the carriers capture cross-section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the increasing of the L n is preferred and a similarity of the specific features of the acoustostimulated increments of L n in [9] and I SC in given study are an evidence of this, namely presence of the US intensity threshold (see Figure 3(a)) and the characteristic time of the process -tens of minutes (see Figure 2). Besides, for λ = 600 nm, the expression for I SC should undergone a little modification: (2) where s is surface recombination rate, and D p -holes' diffusion coefficient inside the n region. Our measurements have shown that L n ≈ 120 µm for the investigated solar cells, hence, for 600-nm illumination 1 L n >> α and I SC does not practically depend on L n .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the ultrasonic treatment of a semiconductor at a threshold power level has certain specific features, which are apparently related to the production of defects in the near-surface region as described in [16,17]. Then, impurity atoms diffusing in the ultrasonic field can segregate at such defects and form impurity "clouds" (analogous to the Cottrell atmospheres [18]), which change the charge density in the surface states, as well as their energy spectrum (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%