2002
DOI: 10.4039/ent13497-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of Lygus species assemblages in canola agroecosystems in relation to ecoregion and crop stage

Abstract: Plant bugs in the genus Lygus (Hahn) (Hemiptera: Miridae) are sporadic pests of canola, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae) and Brassica rapa L., in western Canada and infestations appear to have become increasingly common and severe in recent years. Surveys conducted from 1998 to 2000 identified a "northern" assemblage in the boreal ecoregion that was dominated by Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois), with minor representation of Lygus borealis (Kelton), Lygus elisus (Van Duzee), and Lygus keltoni (Schwartz). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feeding damage by Lygus nymphs and adults can cause flower bud and fruit abortion, sideshoot abscission, leaf tissue perforation and deformation or death of meristem tissue (Strong 1970;Broadbent et al 2002). In North America, Lygus have historically been recorded as destructive pests (Craig & Loan 1984;Young 1986;Coulson 1987), and recent literature demonstrates their continued pest status on a variety of crops, including wheat , oilseed flax , cotton (Layton 2000), canola (Boyd & Lentz 1999;Braun et al 2001;Carcamo et al 2002), alfalfa (Braun et al 2001;May et al 2003;) and strawberry (Rhainds & English-Loeb 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Feeding damage by Lygus nymphs and adults can cause flower bud and fruit abortion, sideshoot abscission, leaf tissue perforation and deformation or death of meristem tissue (Strong 1970;Broadbent et al 2002). In North America, Lygus have historically been recorded as destructive pests (Craig & Loan 1984;Young 1986;Coulson 1987), and recent literature demonstrates their continued pest status on a variety of crops, including wheat , oilseed flax , cotton (Layton 2000), canola (Boyd & Lentz 1999;Braun et al 2001;Carcamo et al 2002), alfalfa (Braun et al 2001;May et al 2003;) and strawberry (Rhainds & English-Loeb 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The apparently narrow host range of L. borealis could be a by-product of our sampling, as they have been collected from other host plants such as canola (Brassica spp.) in other studies (Cárcamo et al, 2002;Otani & Cárcamo, 2011). These results show that Lygus species are truly generalists as we found no genetic divergence based on host.…”
Section: Lack Of Had and Temporal Isolation Within Lygus Speciesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although HAD has been recorded from other Miridae (Hereward, Walter, Debarro, Lowe, & Riginos, 2013), no evidence of HAD has been shown in Lygus species despite the detection of population-level differences based on geography (Burange, Roehrdanz, & Boetel, 2012;Zhou, Kandemir, Walsh, Zalom, & Lavine, 2012). Lygus have one to three generations per year depending on the temperature, where southern populations in warmer climates are multivoltine and northern populations in cooler climates tend to be univoltine (Cárcamo et al, 2002;Haye et al, 2013). The Canadian prairies ecosystem is a major agricultural growing region where Lygus is an economically relevant pest on several field crops, such as canola, alfalfa, and mustard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant bugs of the genus Lygus (Hemiptera: Miridae) are highly polyphagous pests of field and greenhouse crops throughout North America, including vegetable and fruit crops (Broadbent et al , 2002), alfalfa (Soroka, 1997), cotton (Layton 2000) and canola (Cárcamo et al , 2002). Lygus nymphs are commonly parasitized by various species of the genus Peristenus Förster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) (Loan & Bilewicz‐Pawinska, 1973; Goulet & Mason, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%