2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05668.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the level of aggression, chemical and genetic distance among three supercolonies of the Argentine ant in Europe

Abstract: In their invasive ranges, Argentine ant populations often form one geographically vast supercolony, genetically and chemically uniform within which there is no intraspecific aggression. Here we present regional patterns of intraspecific aggression, cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) and population genetics of 18 nesting sites across Corsica and the French mainland. Aggression tests confirm the presence of a third European supercolony, the Corsican supercolony, which exhibits moderate to high levels of aggression, d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
30
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(187 reference statements)
1
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…; Blight et al . ). The homogenization of chemical recognition cues (cuticle hydrocarbons) associated with unicoloniality in introduced populations has often been attributed to a reduction in genetic diversity induced by founding events (bottlenecks) (Tsutsui et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Blight et al . ). The homogenization of chemical recognition cues (cuticle hydrocarbons) associated with unicoloniality in introduced populations has often been attributed to a reduction in genetic diversity induced by founding events (bottlenecks) (Tsutsui et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Blight et al . ). Interestingly, the introduction of social insects is often accompanied by important modifications of their breeding structure (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Polydomy and supercoloniality can be detected genetically as well as behaviorally and chemically. Members of a supercolony are tolerant to each other even if they originate from different nests at the time of their testing, and exhibit chemical uniformity of cuticular hydrocarbon compositions (Errard et al, 2005;Brandt et al, 2009b;Vonshak et al, 2009;Blight et al, 2012;Kidokoro-Kobayashi et al, 2012). Therefore, assessing the population structure of an ant species is best done by encompassing all three parameters, genetic, behavior and recognition chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unicoloniality is also typified by the lack of aggression, even between very distant nests e.g., Linepithema humilis (Giraud et al, 2002;Brandt et al, 2009b;Blight et al, 2012), Wasmannia auropunctata (Errard et al, 2005;Vonshak et al, 2009;Foucaud et al, 2010) or Pheidole megacephala (Fournier et al, 2009). This is attributed to the relaxation or complete loss of nestmate recognition in these population, the mechanism of which is postulated to be either "genetic cleansing" following introduction (Giraud et al, 2002) or a "bottleneck" phenomenon (Suarez et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduced populations of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, have large colonies with two reproducing generations per year, whereas native populations have small colonies with only one reproducing generation per year (Buttermore 1997, Nagamitsu andYamagishi 2009). Introduced populations of several taxa of ants have a unicolonial social organization, including the most destructive invasive species such as Anoplolepis gracilipes, Linepithema humile, Pheidole megacephala, and Wasmannia auropunctata (Morel et al 1990, Vanloon et al 1990, Holway et al 2002, Tsutsui and Suarez 2003, Le Breton et al 2004, Fournier et al 2009, Blight et al 2012. Unicolonial populations are characterized by the absence of colony boundaries between nests that contain many queens and interchange individuals and brood (Hö lldobler and Wilson 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%