2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta05980e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in surface energy and reduction drive of a metal oxide lithium-ion anode with stoichiometry: a DFT study of lithium titanate spinel surfaces

Abstract: Computational screening of lithium-titanate–spinel surfaces reveals how stoichiometry can strongly affect the thermodynamic drive for reduction at metal-oxide-electrode surfaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge the surface energies of the orthorhombic Li~0.5TiO2 phase have not been characterized, but studies of anatase TiO2 suggest surface energies ranging from 0.35 -0.52 J/m 2 for the {101} facet and 0.51 -0.96 J/m 2 for the {001} facet, 94,[116][117][118] and a similar range for average surface energies. [119][120][121] Computations of the (111) surface of a comparable material, Li4Ti5O12, indicate that surface energies increase from 0.35 J/m 2 to 0.61 J/m 2 upon lithiation to Li7Ti5O12, 122 so it is conceivable that the lithiated orthorhombic Li~0.5TiO2 phase has an average surface energy that is about 0.11 J/m 2 greater than the tetragonal anatase TiO2 phase. Phase-field simulations of Li and phase boundary flux in single particles provide a more physical probe of the relationship between particle morphology and charging energetics.…”
Section: Energetic Effects Of Nanocrystal Morphology On LI Insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge the surface energies of the orthorhombic Li~0.5TiO2 phase have not been characterized, but studies of anatase TiO2 suggest surface energies ranging from 0.35 -0.52 J/m 2 for the {101} facet and 0.51 -0.96 J/m 2 for the {001} facet, 94,[116][117][118] and a similar range for average surface energies. [119][120][121] Computations of the (111) surface of a comparable material, Li4Ti5O12, indicate that surface energies increase from 0.35 J/m 2 to 0.61 J/m 2 upon lithiation to Li7Ti5O12, 122 so it is conceivable that the lithiated orthorhombic Li~0.5TiO2 phase has an average surface energy that is about 0.11 J/m 2 greater than the tetragonal anatase TiO2 phase. Phase-field simulations of Li and phase boundary flux in single particles provide a more physical probe of the relationship between particle morphology and charging energetics.…”
Section: Energetic Effects Of Nanocrystal Morphology On LI Insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, we consider strains corresponding to model {100} A |{100} B coherent interfaces between the doped (Mg,Al) spinel and the target electrode (lithium manganate or lithium titanate spinel). Li 4+3z Ti 5 O 12 is a "zero-strain" material, whose lattice parameters change by <0.1% upon lithium intercalation and extraction [19,48,49] In addition to potential energy profiles from our CI-NEB calculations, we also present electrostatic potential profiles along each path. These are defined as the average electrostatic potential at the site of the mobile ion, evaluated at the optimized geometry of each NEB image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough analysis and reconstruction of the LTO surface is another Taken from Ref. [109] challenging area to explore due to different possible terminations and stoichiometry in both the Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 surfaces [112]. However, a better understanding of the LTO surface will lead to critical insights about interfacial kinetics and SEI formation which can address an inherent problem such the gassing problem in LTO [113,114] during the charge and discharge process.…”
Section: Challenges and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%