2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in action: Contributions of a songbird cortical-basal ganglia circuit to vocal motor learning and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This especially refers to learning. For instance, juvenile songbirds were found to express larger vocal variability than adults [11], which was considered to be a key promoter of learning [12]. In the human motor domain, the idea that variability is relevant for learning was tested in a recent experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This especially refers to learning. For instance, juvenile songbirds were found to express larger vocal variability than adults [11], which was considered to be a key promoter of learning [12]. In the human motor domain, the idea that variability is relevant for learning was tested in a recent experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movement variability is an integral part of motor learning [29,[42][43][44]. We can modulate the degree of variability used during motor learning, as either part of a reward [45] or error-based learning process [46], and this modulation in variability eventually decreases once we master a new motor skill [47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because LMAN is known to control the level of variability in acoustic structure of song syllables 4, 30, 56 , and these are more variable in juveniles than adults, we measured the overall degree of song syllable acoustic similarity pre versus post-surgery (a measure that summarizes multiple acoustic features into one value; see methods). There was a very small (mean change from pre to post = 1.10 ± 0.36), but significant decrease in the control group in the degree of percentage similarity from one song motif to another song motif (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%