1994
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1016515
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Fourty-seven patients with a least one heart valve operation each who underwent reoperations (Gr. I) were analyzed with special regard to risk factors influencing the perioperative mortality and compared to 203 patients operated for the first time (Gr. II) during the same time period. Mean age was 57.1 years in Gr. I and 64.1 years in Gr. II (p < 0.05). There were no differences between the groups with regard to sex, smoking, obesity, or concomitant peripheral vascular disease. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of patients in this study received TAVI and presented at the time of the procedure with at least NYHA class III. Likewise, Christenson et al 18 retrospectively evaluated MR in patients presenting with aortic valve stenosis combined with MR, who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft. They had a relatively small cohort of 60 patients with a median NYHA classification of 3.0 ± 0.8 in their patient cohort which is similar to our patient collective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of patients in this study received TAVI and presented at the time of the procedure with at least NYHA class III. Likewise, Christenson et al 18 retrospectively evaluated MR in patients presenting with aortic valve stenosis combined with MR, who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft. They had a relatively small cohort of 60 patients with a median NYHA classification of 3.0 ± 0.8 in their patient cohort which is similar to our patient collective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%