2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of percutaneous controlled radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the treatment of isolated third division trigeminal neuralgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
41
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
41
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the incidence of postoperative facial numbness in groups A and B was 85 and 86%, respectively, different from those in the study previously performed by Fraioli et al (2009). This difference was probably due to the disparate RFT temperatures used between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the incidence of postoperative facial numbness in groups A and B was 85 and 86%, respectively, different from those in the study previously performed by Fraioli et al (2009). This difference was probably due to the disparate RFT temperatures used between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The immediate pain relief rates in group A and B were 94.3 and 97.6%, respectively, lower than those reported in the literature (Fraioli et al, 2009). Previous studies have reported immediate pain relief rates from RFT in the treatment of TN between 91-99% (Bovaira et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2013;Weng et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Many therapies have been proposed for the treatment of medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia: anatomically destructive methods, including retrogasserian rootlet thermocoagulation [14][15][16] , and percutaneous balloon compression; 17 and anatomically nondestructive methods, including gasserian ganglion glycerolrhizolysis, 18,19 and microvascular decompression. 20 Non-invasive procedures are also performed, including various types of RS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a temperature of 65°C for all the patients being well tolerated and safe. It's wellknown that serious complications often occur at a temperature ≥70°C [16][17][18]. Our opinion is that the optimal temperature should be between 60 and 65°C.…”
Section: Journal Of Headache and Pain Management Issn 2472-1913mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, information on temperature used for CRF for V1 TN was not mentioned in some reports [19,20]. Using previous reports information [1,12,[17][18] we adjusted the temperature to less than 70°C and all the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. Facial numbness was found the most frequent transient complication (19%) that improved in more than 50% after 2 months and almost 90% in 10 months.…”
Section: Journal Of Headache and Pain Management Issn 2472-1913mentioning
confidence: 99%