Validity of a Norwegian version of the Desire Thinking Questionnaire (DTQ): Associations with problem drinking, nicotine dependence and problematic social media use

Solem, Stian; Pedersen, Henrik; Nesse, Frikk; Janssen, Arne Garvik; Kennair, Leif Edward Ottesen; Hagen, Roger; Havnen, Audun; Hjemdal, Odin; Caselli, Gabriele; Spada, Marcantonio M.

doi:10.1002/cpp.2524

Cited by 15 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We theoretically propose and empirically embed a place for desire thinking within the I-PACE model [42,43] in the realm of internet-use disorders including gaming [26][27][28][29], pornography viewing [27,30], social networks use [20,27], shopping and gambling [27], and the general use of the internet [5, 7, 31•, 32, 33]. Evidence suggests a close link between desire thinking and aversive triggers, where desire thinking might be used as a maladaptive coping mechanism.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, this study gives a first impression that the temperamental constitution of seeking novel and exciting sensations seems to contribute to the mental simulation of experiences in order to experience gratification. The postulated relief-oriented pathway gathers two studies in the context of internet-use disorders that found mild bivariate correlations between desire thinking and psychological distress (e.g., depressive symptoms) among individuals playing internet games [26] and individuals using social networks problematically [20], indicative of a relation that cannot be interpreted causally. However, an investigation of desire thinking within a structural equation model revealed the idea that desire thinking may be used to alleviate negative mood states in the context of potentially addictive online activities [27].…”

Section: Processing Of Triggers and Desire Thinkingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As with other affective and cognitive processes specific for addictive disorders (e.g., craving, cue reactivity), desire thinking is observable among substance-use disorders as well as addictive behaviors and internet-use disorders, respectively. It has been investigated in the context of problem alcohol drinking [8,[14][15][16][17][18][19] next to a few studies on tobacco use [5,20,21] and eating behaviors [22][23][24] and successively gains an attentional focus among addictive behaviors (for a meta-analysis, see [25•]) and specific internet-use disorders. As such, it has been investigated in the context of gaming [26][27][28][29], pornography viewing [27,30], social networks use [20,27], shopping and gambling [27], and the general use of the internet [5, 7, 31•, 32, 33], indicative of its relevance among (potentially problematic) online behaviors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Integrating Desire Thinking into the I-PACE Model: a Special Focus on Internet-Use Disorders

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review This manuscript aims to propose an integration of desire thinking into the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model based on theoretical considerations within the Elaborated Intrusion Theory of Desire and Self-Regulatory Execution Function model and empirical evidence from the field of internet-use disorders. Recent Findings Theory and research on desire thinking in the context of internet-use disorders suggest considerable relations to craving, metacognitive beliefs, and emphasizes its nature when initiated as a reaction towards unpleasant triggers. Accordingly, we postulate that desire thinking may be located at the position for affective and cognitive reactions towards triggers within the I-PACE model. Summary The suggested integration of desire thinking into the I-PACE model specifically implies the assumption of a relief-oriented and pleasure-oriented entry pathway into desire thinking and a feedback loop between desire thinking and the experience of gratification and compensation. The model pathways proposed here may serve as a theoretical basis for future research and need further empirical verification.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Processing Of Triggers and Desire Thinkingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating Desire Thinking into the I-PACE Model: a Special Focus on Internet-Use Disorders

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The PHQ-4 has also demonstrated good reliability and validity in clinical and population samples for the Norwegian and German versions (e.g. [ 47 – 50 , 53 , 54 ]). McDonald’s omegas in this study were .91 (Norwegian sample), and .91 (German-speaking sample).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Locus of control moderates the association of COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: results of a Norwegian and a German-speaking cross-sectional survey

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background An internal locus of control (LoC I) refers to the belief that the outcome of events in one’s life is contingent upon one’s actions, whereas an external locus of control (LoC E) describes the belief that chance and powerful others control one’s life. This study investigated whether LoC I and LoC E moderated the relationship between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress in the general population during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This cross-sectional survey study analysed data from a Norwegian (n = 1225) and a German-speaking sample (n = 1527). We measured LoC with the Locus of Control-4 Scale (IE-4), COVID-19 stress with a scale developed for this purpose, and mental distress with the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4). Moderation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS. Results The association between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress was strong (r = .61 and r = .55 for the Norwegian and the German-speaking sample, respectively). In both samples, LoC showed substantial moderation effects. LoC I served as a buffer (p < .001), and LoC E exacerbated (p < .001) the relation between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress. Conclusions The data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic is easier to bear for people who, despite pandemic-related strains, feel that they generally have influence over their own lives. An external locus of control, conversely, is associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. The prevention of mental distress may be supported by enabling a sense of control through citizen participation in policy decisions and transparent explanation in their implementation.

show abstract

“…The PHQ-4 has demonstrated good reliability and validity in clinical and population samples for the Norwegian and German versions [e.g. [44][45][46][47][48][49]. Cronbach's alphas in this study were .82 (Norwegian sample), and .84 (German-speaking sample).…”

Section: General Mental Distressmentioning

confidence: 62%

Locus of control moderates the association of COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: Results of a cross-sectional survey in two large samples from Norway, Germany, and Austria

Krampe

Danbolt

Haver

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An internal locus of control (LoC I) refers to the belief that the outcome of events in one’s life is contingent upon one’s actions, whereas an external locus of control (LoC E) describes the belief that chance and powerful others control one's life. This study investigated whether LoC I and LoC E moderated the relationship between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress in the general population during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional survey study analysed data from a Norwegian (n=1,225) and a German-speaking sample (n=1,527). We measured LoC with the Locus of Control-4 Scale (IE-4), COVID-19 stress with a scale developed for this purpose, and mental distress with the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4). Moderation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS. Results: The association between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress was strong (r=.61 and r=.55 for the Norwegian and the German-speaking sample, respectively). In both samples, LoC showed substantial moderation effects. LoC I served as a buffer (p<.001), and LoC E exacerbated (p<.001) the relation between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress. Conclusions: The data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic is easier to bear for people who, despite pandemic-related strains, feel that they generally have influence over their own lives. An external locus of control, conversely, is associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. The prevention of mental distress may be supported by enabling a sense of control through citizen participation in policy decisions and transparent explanation in their implementation.

show abstract

Validity of a Norwegian version of the Desire Thinking Questionnaire (DTQ): Associations with problem drinking, nicotine dependence and problematic social media use

Cited by 15 publications

References 43 publications

Integrating Desire Thinking into the I-PACE Model: a Special Focus on Internet-Use Disorders

Integrating Desire Thinking into the I-PACE Model: a Special Focus on Internet-Use Disorders

Locus of control moderates the association of COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: results of a Norwegian and a German-speaking cross-sectional survey

Locus of control moderates the association of COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: Results of a cross-sectional survey in two large samples from Norway, Germany, and Austria

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About