Validation of the Short-Form 36 for Adolescents Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life improvements after reduction mammaplasty have been reported by patients. Although instruments exist for adults, a validated outcomes survey is not available for adolescents. This study aims to validate the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) for adolescents undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Methods: Patients aged 12-21 years were prospectively recruited between 2008 and 2021 to unaffected or macromastia cohorts. Patients completed four baseline surveys: SF-36, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Breast-related Symptoms Questionnaire, and Eating Attitudes Test. Surveys were repeated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (macromastia cohort), and at 6 and 12 months from baseline (unaffected cohort). Content, construct, and longitudinal validity were assessed. Results: A total of 258 patients with macromastia (median age: 17.5 years), and 128 unaffected patients (median age: 17.0 years) were included. Content validity was established, and construct validity was fulfilled: internal consistency was confirmed for all domains (Cronbach alpha >0.7); convergent validity was satisfied through expected correlations between the SF-36 and Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Breastrelated Symptoms Questionnaire, and Eating Attitudes Test, and known-groups validity was established through significantly lower mean scores in all SF-36 domains in the macromastia cohort compared with unaffected patients. Longitudinal validity was established by significant improvements in domain scores from baseline to 6 and 12 months postoperatively in patients with macromastia (P < 0.05, all). Conclusions: The SF-36 is a valid instrument for adolescents undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Although other instruments have been used for older patients, we recommend the SF-36 when assessing health-related quality of life changes in younger populations.

The Impact of Tuberous Breast on Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study

“…[19][20][21] These surveys were chosen for their reliability, validity, and extensive use in other studies focused on female adolescents and adults in benign matters of the breast. 3,4,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The SF-36 measures HRQoL in eight domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. 19 Raw scores in these domains are transformed to a 0-100 scale in which higher scores correspond to more favorable HRQoL.…”

The Influence of Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Quality of Life in Coronary Heart Disease Patients

“…Quality of life is measured using a Quality of Life (QoL), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) 36 questions measuring eight domains, including physical health, social functioning, and mental health. This instrument is valid and reliable based on the results of validity and reliability tests with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.7-0.9 (McNamara et al, 2023).…”