Validation of the physiological background correction method for the suppression of the spill-in effect near highly radioactive regions in positron emission tomography

Abstract

BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) imaging has a wide applicability in oncology, cardiology and neurology. However, a major drawback when imaging very active regions such as the bladder is the spill-in effect, leading to inaccurate quantification and obscured visualisation of nearby lesions. Therefore, this study aims at investigating and correcting for the spill-in effect from high-activity regions to the surroundings as a function of activity in the hot region, lesion size and location, system resolution and application of post-filtering using a recently proposed background correction technique. This study involves analytical simulations for the digital XCAT2 phantom and validation acquiring NEMA phantom and patient data with the GE Signa PET/MR scanner. Reconstructions were done using the ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm. Dedicated point-spread function (OSEM+PSF) and a recently proposed background correction (OSEM+PSF+BC) were incorporated into the reconstruction for spill-in correction. The standardised uptake values (SUV) were compared for all reconstruction algorithms.ResultsThe simulation study revealed that lesions within 15–20 mm from the hot region were predominantly affected by the spill-in effect, leading to an increased bias and impaired lesion visualisation within the region. For OSEM, lesion SUVmax converged to the true value at low bladder activity, but as activity increased, there was an overestimation as much as 19% for proximal lesions (distance around 15–20 mm from the bladder edge) and 2–4% for distant lesions (distance larger than 20 mm from the bladder edge). As bladder SUV increases, the % SUV change for proximal lesions is about 31% and 6% for SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively, showing that the spill-in effect is more evident for the SUVmax than the SUVmean. Also, the application of post-filtering resulted in up to 65% increment in the spill-in effect around the bladder edges. For proximal lesions, PSF has no major improvement over OSEM because of the spill-in effect, coupled with the blurring effect by post-filtering. Within two voxels around the bladder, the spill-in effect in OSEM is 42% (32%), while for OSEM+PSF, it is 31% (19%), with (and without) post-filtering, respectively. But with OSEM+PSF+BC, the spill-in contribution from the bladder was relatively low (below 5%, either with or without post-filtering). These results were further validated using the NEMA phantom and patient data for which OSEM+PSF+BC showed about 70–80% spill-in reduction around the bladder edges and increased contrast-to-noise ratio up to 36% compared to OSEM and OSEM+PSF reconstructions without post-filtering.ConclusionThe spill-in effect is dependent on the activity in the hot region, lesion size and location, as well as post-filtering; and this is more evident in SUVmax than SUVmean. However, the recently proposed background correction method facilitates stability in quantification and enhances the contrast in lesions with low uptake.Electronic supplementary materialThe onli...

Iterative reconstruction incorporating background correction improves quantification of [18F]-NaF PET/CT images of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

“…28 The spill in effect from the bone into the aneurysm was corrected using a previously proposed background correction (BC) technique. [29][30][31] More information about the technique can be seen in the supplementary material. All resulting reconstructed images were post-filtered with an isotropic 3 mm FWHM Gaussian filter.…”

Comparison of Correction Techniques for the Spillin Effect in Emission Tomography

“…The kernel method re-parameterizes the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm in terms of spatial basis functions (kernel matrix K) and coefficients ( ). Therefore, the image to be reconstructed, , can be expressed as: (4) where is the element of the kernel matrix, and is the coefficient vector to be estimated in the expectation maximization step as shown in (5): (5) Since the hybrid kernel method extracts information from both anatomical and PET images, the kernel matrix can then be expressed as: (6) where and are the kernel components from the attenuation and PET images respectively, calculated using the functions in (7) and (8):…”

“…PVE could be in the form of spill-out effect, which leads to loss of activity from a target tissue to the surrounding regions, or spill-in effect, which results in excess activity moving from adjacent regions into a tissue [3]. The spill-in effect is particularly evident when a small region of interest (ROI) lies in close proximity to regions of very high tracer uptake [4]- [7].…”

“…Recently, a background correction (BC) technique was implemented which iteratively removes the entire background contribution from the reconstructed image [5], [7]- [11]. This method showed promising results for spill-in correction, but the BC technique to the best of our knowledge has been tested only in one clinical case, so far [8].…”

Optimizing arterial 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography analysis

“…The recent study by Akerele, published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, aimed to address this limitation by utilizing a background correction (BC) technique in the examination of aortic 18 F-NaF PET. 5 The BC technique was originally developed for oncological applications 13 and uses a mask of the vertebral bodies, identified on the attenuation correction CT scan, to effectively extract radiotracer activity originating from that region. This leaves only non-vertebral and importantly, aortic specific, radiotracer activity for quantification.…”