2018
DOI: 10.1002/jocb.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Italian Remote Associate Test

Abstract: The scientific approach to the study of creative problem‐solving has shifted from using classic insight problems (e.g., the Nine‐dots problem), toward sets of problems that have more robust psychometric properties, such as the Remote Associate Test (RAT). Because it is homogeneous, compact, quickly solvable, and easy to score, the RAT has been used more frequently in recent creativity studies. We applied the Item Response Theory (IRT) to develop an Italian version of this task. The final 51‐item test was relia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterward, the problem words were erased and participants had to report, via button press, whether they had solved the problem via insight or analysis. Self-reports for insight and analytic solving have been established in numerous behavioral and neuroimaging studies (e.g., Cristofori et al, 2018 ; Jung-Beeman et al, 2004 ; Kounios et al, 2006 ; Laukkonen and Tangen, 2018 ; Salvi et al, 2018 ; Salvi et al, 2016a ,b; Santarnecchi et al, 2019 ; Salvi et al, 2020 ; Salvi and Bowden, 2019 ). No feedback was given to participants regarding whether the solution they had provided was correct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, the problem words were erased and participants had to report, via button press, whether they had solved the problem via insight or analysis. Self-reports for insight and analytic solving have been established in numerous behavioral and neuroimaging studies (e.g., Cristofori et al, 2018 ; Jung-Beeman et al, 2004 ; Kounios et al, 2006 ; Laukkonen and Tangen, 2018 ; Salvi et al, 2018 ; Salvi et al, 2016a ,b; Santarnecchi et al, 2019 ; Salvi et al, 2020 ; Salvi and Bowden, 2019 ). No feedback was given to participants regarding whether the solution they had provided was correct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRAs have been shown to correlate with several measures of creative performance e.g., the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, classic insight problems, the Alternative Uses Task and the Creative Achievements Questionnaire 69 .…”
Section: Figure 1 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each cue word may combine with the solution word to form a compound word or phrase or may relate to the solution word by semantic association or synonymity (e.g., problem: tooth/potato/heart — solution: SWEET). The example used in the Italian language was scuola, tutto , and domani (translation: school, all, tomorrow) which forms the compound doposcuola, dopotutto, and dopodomani (translation: afterschool, after all, after tomorrow; Salvi et al, 2015b , 2018 ). For this study, CRA problems consisted of 40 trials per session (for a total of 120 Italian CRA problems, taken from Salvi et al, 2015b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems are also used to study the cognitive processes of idea generation, as they can be solved either via sudden insight (i.e., “Aha!” moment) or in a step-by-step (i.e., analytic) fashion (e.g., Jung-Beeman et al, 2004 ). Many ideas or solutions to problems are generated through sudden insight that is then construed as creative thinking (Friedman and Förster, 2005 ; Salvi et al, 2018 ). Creativity is the result of multiple interacting cognitive processes supported by a large network of brain areas (Eysenck, 1993 ; Heilman, 2005 ; Beaty et al, 2016 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%