2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the CFD code fluent by post-test calculation of a density-driven ROCOM experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the SYRTHES solver is not parallel, it limits the overall performance of NHESDYN. Hence NEPTUNE-CFD/SYRTHES should be replaced by commercial CFD codes numerically stable, robust, and more user friendly such as ANSYS CFX [17] or FLUENT [18]; therefore this will allow the analysis of larger problems making use of massive parallel computers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the SYRTHES solver is not parallel, it limits the overall performance of NHESDYN. Hence NEPTUNE-CFD/SYRTHES should be replaced by commercial CFD codes numerically stable, robust, and more user friendly such as ANSYS CFX [17] or FLUENT [18]; therefore this will allow the analysis of larger problems making use of massive parallel computers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar numerical methods and turbulence model were used by several authors [40][41][42][43][44] both are involved in the actual flow. These studies showed that the RSM model associated with a two layer model fairly predicts the experimental data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the standard k-E model is the one used most widely (Talal, model is overly diffusive and inaccurate for treating near-wall situations, whereas the RNG k-e model shows the best agreement with the options of enhanced wall treatment (Kang and Strand, 2013). Therefore, in this study, the RNG /c-e model, which was developed by Yakhot and Orzag (1986), was chosen to describe the turbulence flow behavior in the reactor for its default option with "low Reynolds number" and "differential viscosity model" as recommended by FLUENT (Schaffrath et al, 2007).…”
Section: F Ig U R E 2 -S C H E M a T Ic V Ie W O F Th E G R Id D In Gmentioning
confidence: 99%