2013
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2215041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of SMOS L1C and L2 Products and Important Parameters of the Retrieval Algorithm in the Skjern River Catchment, Western Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsequent study (Bircher et al, 2012b) showed that in case of soil moisture subgroups of the network stations based on different criteria (e.g. soil type, land cover and composite classes) did not achieve as good statistical results as the entire network average when compared with SMOS data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A subsequent study (Bircher et al, 2012b) showed that in case of soil moisture subgroups of the network stations based on different criteria (e.g. soil type, land cover and composite classes) did not achieve as good statistical results as the entire network average when compared with SMOS data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, it is also likely that the deviances between SMOS and in situ soil moisture could be lowered by using Mironov in the SMOS retrieval algorithm. Furthermore, in a subsequent study (Bircher et al, 2012b), SMOS data was filtered based on quality parameters contained in the L2 product which showed very good correspondence with an RFI detection scheme based on L1A data (Anterrieu , 2011). Comparing the filtered SMOS data with the network average improved the correlation significantly, nearly meeting up with the one for the ECMWF model.…”
Section: Smos L2 Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large number of validation studies of remotely sensed SSM products have been carried out (Albergel et al, 2011;Sánchez et al, 2012;Bircher et al, 2013). These studies are usually performed using airborne and/or ground-observed data over a well-equipped site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been performed to validate brightness temperatures too (Rüdiger et al, 2011;Montzka et al, 2013). In Bircher et al (2013) TBs are also validated with network and airborne data over a SMOS pixel in the Skjern River catchment (Denmark). LSMs coupled to radiative transfer models (RTMs) can contribute to the analysis and validation of passive microwave (MW) data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%