2014
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2014.887794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of MR thermometry: Method for temperature probe sensor registration accuracy in head and neck phantoms

Abstract: The techniques presented here may be used to simplify calibration experiments that use an interstitial heating device, or any heating method that provides rapid and spatially localised heat distributions. Overall, the experimental verification of the data registration and PRFS thermal coefficient calibration technique provides a useful benchmarking method to maximise MRT accuracy in any similar context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear regression analysis of our phantom measurements provided robust data for each metabolites' chemical shift indicating a thorough and accurate choice of acquisition methods in agreement with the previous literature (Marshall et al, 2006;Zhu et al, 2008;Covaciu et al, 2010;Vescovo et al, 2013;Tarasek et al, 2014;Babourina-Brooks et al, 2015). However, by comparing the measured tympanic temperature with the calculated temperature from in vivo measurements, only NAA and Cr were consistent enough regarding their standard deviations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The linear regression analysis of our phantom measurements provided robust data for each metabolites' chemical shift indicating a thorough and accurate choice of acquisition methods in agreement with the previous literature (Marshall et al, 2006;Zhu et al, 2008;Covaciu et al, 2010;Vescovo et al, 2013;Tarasek et al, 2014;Babourina-Brooks et al, 2015). However, by comparing the measured tympanic temperature with the calculated temperature from in vivo measurements, only NAA and Cr were consistent enough regarding their standard deviations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The central heated region in this phantom corresponded very well to those obtained earlier by infrared measurements in a muscle-only split-phantom phantom for the setup without MR compatibility feature (LabCollar) [54]. This device was again validated pre-clinically in an oil-gel phantom by applying a combination of MR imaging and 3D spline fitting for accurate probe localization [55]. The result corresponds to a reduced average error of DT < 0.14 C with a maximum error of DT ¼ 0.22 C.…”
Section: Decoupled Devices (Ht-only Inserts)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Given recent progress in thermal modelling [48], one can imagine further improved characterisation of pelvic temperature distribution using a combination of local thermometry, volumetric thermometry and patient specific simulations, as demonstrated for head and neck cancer [162], for example, where measurements and simulations are combined into estimated temperature maps [163]. One example of a hybrid simulation/optical probe approach recently demonstrated accurate assessment of the T 50 , based on sparse invasive probe measurements [164], but the fusion of MRI and invasive measurements in the same coordinate space is still challenging [165]. For bladder cancer, this technique might provide a good option to reconstruct the temperature within the bladder wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%