2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13534-018-0072-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of foot pitch angle estimation using inertial measurement unit against marker-based optical 3D motion capture system

Abstract: Gait analysis is relevant to a broad range of clinical applications in areas of orthopedics, neurosurgery, rehabilitation and the sports medicine. There are various methods available for capturing and analyzing the gait cycle. Most of gait analysis methods are computationally expensive and difficult to implement outside the laboratory environment. Inertial measurement units, IMUs are considered a promising alternative for the future of gait analysis. This study reports the results of a systematic validation pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study compared the accuracy of the IMU system with the Vicon motion capture system (with an 18 camera setup) [31]. A strong correlation was observed (more than 96.9%) between the IMU system and the Vicon motion capture system [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That study compared the accuracy of the IMU system with the Vicon motion capture system (with an 18 camera setup) [31]. A strong correlation was observed (more than 96.9%) between the IMU system and the Vicon motion capture system [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related works of estimating foot angles using inertial sensing reported comparable range of FPAs, resulting in similar performance as our proposed approach (maximum mean difference of ~ 2.6°). Bidabadi et al used a single foot-worn IMU to estimate the foot pitch angle (ankle flexion/extension) and reported a mean accuracy of ~ 3.8° [ 24 ]. Huang et al presented a single foot-worn IMU (with magnetometer) approach for estimating the FPA with a maximum mean error of ~ 2.5° [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inertial sensors were located on the body of the study participant to record the accelerations according to the myoMotion protocol, described in the instruction manual ( Figure 1 ). The accuracy and validity of the inertial measurement units (IMU) system in angle determination is unquestioned and was the subject of previous research [ 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%