2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of agronomic UAV and field measurements for tomato varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing via unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) is currently being investigated as a means to close the gap because of its capability to acquire the high temporal and spatial resolution data required for high throughput phenotyping over relatively limited areas. UAVs can collect huge quantities of data "on demand", providing opportunities for estimation and prediction of a wide range of agronomic traits [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing via unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) is currently being investigated as a means to close the gap because of its capability to acquire the high temporal and spatial resolution data required for high throughput phenotyping over relatively limited areas. UAVs can collect huge quantities of data "on demand", providing opportunities for estimation and prediction of a wide range of agronomic traits [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moeckel et al (2018) estimated crop height and biomass of eggplant, tomato and cabbage plants from UAV-based Red-Green-Blue (RGB) imagery and Structure-from-Motion and found a good correlation with manual field observations. Enciso et al (2019) used RGB and multi-spectral UAV imagery collected during the growing season of eight difference tomato varieties to estimate plant height, canopy cover and NDVI, and found that height could be accurately estimated and that canopy cover was highly correlated with field-based LAI measurements. However, this assessment was performed at the plot and not individual plant level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research applying drone technologies to phenotyping crops (Huang et al, 2013; López‐Granados et al, 2016; Gnädinger and Schmidhalter, 2017; Nasir and Tharani, 2017) builds on the extensive experience of the remote‐sensing community (Rouse et al, 1974; Li et al, 2014; Liebisch et al, 2015; Minervini et al, 2015). Several diverse crops, including tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and maize ( Zea mays L.), have been phenotyped for traits ranging from plant height to stress responses to vegetative parameters measured at the canopy level (Condorelli et al, 2018; Enciso et al, 2019; Gracia‐Romero et al, 2019; Johansen et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2019). As described by Shi et al (2016), the most common flight trajectory is a tight serpentine over the field with the camera in nadir view.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%