2022
DOI: 10.1111/hel.12888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and improvement of a multiplex PCR method to detect murine Helicobacter species in feces samples of mice

Abstract: Background Murine Helicobacter species have gained increasing awareness in mouse facilities over the last years. Infections with Helicobacter species may have an impact effect on the health of mice and might pose a zoonotic risk to researchers. To minimize the interference with experiments and hence contribute to the 3Rs, a reliable method of monitoring Helicobacter infections in animal facilities needs to be available. The aim of this study was to improve and validate the detection of the most common murine H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of a DNA quality control into the Helicobacter multiplex DNA finder gives information about the validity of samples and reduces the number of false-negative results. Analytical sensitivity of the Helicobacter DNA multiplex finder ranged from 10 to 1000 copies which is comparable to published qPCR assays and to other multiplex Helicobacter PCR assays, assuming that one bacterial cell contains at least one 16S rRNA copy [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. We determined the sensitivity in detecting Helicobacter infections in comparison to published conventional singleplex PCR assays routinely applied for monitoring laboratory animals at DKFZ, and found the novel Helicobacter multiplex DNA finder to be highly comparable (kappa = 0.95 (95%CI 0.901–0.999)), with a more sensitive detection of H. hepaticus, H. bilis , and H. typhlonius , analyzing 241 samples with both assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The integration of a DNA quality control into the Helicobacter multiplex DNA finder gives information about the validity of samples and reduces the number of false-negative results. Analytical sensitivity of the Helicobacter DNA multiplex finder ranged from 10 to 1000 copies which is comparable to published qPCR assays and to other multiplex Helicobacter PCR assays, assuming that one bacterial cell contains at least one 16S rRNA copy [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. We determined the sensitivity in detecting Helicobacter infections in comparison to published conventional singleplex PCR assays routinely applied for monitoring laboratory animals at DKFZ, and found the novel Helicobacter multiplex DNA finder to be highly comparable (kappa = 0.95 (95%CI 0.901–0.999)), with a more sensitive detection of H. hepaticus, H. bilis , and H. typhlonius , analyzing 241 samples with both assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…So far, Helicobacter detection in routine health monitoring is mostly accomplished by PCR covering single or a small groups of Helicobacter spp. and subsequent gel electrophoresis or qPCR, both being time-, labor- and/or cost-intensive [ 2 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Moreover, these PCR assays most often target 16S rRNA, which is known to have homologies between Helicobacter spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%