Validating the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for use with people with aphasia: an analysis of differential item function (DIF)

Baylor, Carolyn; Oelke, Megan; Bamer, Alyssa M.; Hunsaker, Eileen; Off, Catherine A.; Wallace, Sarah E.; Pennington, Suzanne; Kendall, Diane L.; Yorkston, Kathryn M.

doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1225274

Cited by 42 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All responses to items on the outcome measures included in the quantitative studies needed to be from the person with the communication disorder (i.e., patient-reported). Responses generated by proxies such as clinicians or family members may yield different results from the individual with the communication disorder (Baylor et al 2017, Cruice et al 2005. As a result, studies that solely included responses from proxy raters were excluded.…”

Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to perceived social support, factors include disorder severity, other environmental influences, and personal factors (e.g., coping responses). All of these variables have been found to affect communication outcomes in different populations, and all need further study (Baylor et al 2017, Baylor et al 2010, Hilari et al 2012, McAuliffe et al 2016, Yorkston et al 2001.…”

Section: Future Directions and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relationship between perceived social support and patient‐reported communication outcomes across communication disorders: a systematic review

Eadie

Kapsner-Smith

Bolt

et al. 2018

Intl J Lang & Comm Disor

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Future Directions and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between perceived social support and patient‐reported communication outcomes across communication disorders: a systematic review

Eadie

Kapsner-Smith

Bolt

et al. 2018

Intl J Lang & Comm Disor

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CPIB was developed using IRT, and the analysis to evaluate item parameter differences between populations in IRT is an analysis of differential item functioning (DIF; Choi, Gibbons, & Crane, 2011). Prior studies with the CPIB have revealed no meaningful DIF across groups with different speech and language disorders (e.g., Baylor et al, 2016Baylor et al, , 2013 as well as between two different countries (Baylor et al, 2014). However, given the patterns observed in the descriptive feedback in this study, it is possible that DIF may be observed between the groups with speech and language disorders versus individuals with hearing loss, particularly on the items that participants with hearing loss found less relevant to their experiences.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One 10-item short form is currently available for clinical and research use (Baylor et al, 2013). That short form has been validated for adults with speech and language disorders (Baylor et al, 2016(Baylor et al, , 2013. Future goals for CPIB development include computerized adaptive testing (Cook, O'Malley, & Roddey, 2005).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Relevance of Items in the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for Individuals With Hearing Loss

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) was developed to evaluate participation restrictions in communication situations for individuals with speech and language disorders. This study evaluated the potential relevance of CPIB items for individuals with hearing loss. Method: Cognitive interviews were conducted with 17 adults with a range of treated and untreated hearing loss, who responded to 46 items. Interviews were continued until saturation was reached and prevalent trends emerged. A focus group was also conducted with 3 experienced audiologists to seek their views on the CPIB. Analysis of data included qualitative and quantitative approaches.Results: The majority of the items were applicable to individuals with hearing loss; however, 12 items were identified as potentially not relevant. This was largely attributed to the items' focus on speech production rather than hearing. The results from the focus group were in agreement for a majority of items. Conclusions: The next step in validating the CPIB for individuals with hearing loss is a psychometric analysis on a large sample. Possible outcomes could be that the CPIB is considered valid in its entirety or the creation of a new questionnaire or a hearing loss-specific short form with a subset of items is necessary. M ost of the life roles in which we engage, such as at home, at work, and in social situations, require communication that involves a bidirectional transfer of information among people. The term communicative participation has been described as "taking part in life situations that involve an exchange of information, ideas, or feelings" (Eadie et al., 2006, p. 309). This term is based on the definition of participation from the World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), which defines participation as involvement in life roles. Communication is considered a critical element of life participation by hearing loss experts and individuals with hearing loss (Granberg, Pronk, et al., 2014;Granberg, Swanepoel, Englund, Möller, & Danermark, 2014). According to the ICF and other biopsychosocial frameworks of health, the impact of a health condition on life participation is shaped by a combination of variables, including the nature and extent of physical injury or impairment, the characteristics of the individual, and the environmental context. In a similar manner, the impact that a communication disorder, such as hearing loss, has on a person's participation in life situations might depend on the severity of the hearing loss, the characteristics of that individual, and the listening conditions of the environment, among other issues. Audiologists who have a deep appreciation for how a client's hearing loss influences participation in real-life situations might be better able to meet the habilitation or rehabilitation needs of their clients via amplification, aural rehabilitation, counseling, or other avenues. To achieve these goals, however, clinicians and researchers need valid...

show abstract

“…As of this writing, there are few validated measures dedicated to communicative participation, which may be related to several challenges in developing these instruments including agreeing on the definition and scope of the construct of 'participation,' as well as the rigorous process for developing measures demanded in the current state of measurement science (Brandenburg, Worrall, Rodriguez, & Bagraith, 2015;Darling-White, 2017). Published PROs for adults include the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) that captures the extent to which the individual feels he or she is experiencing restrictions in daily conversational situations (Baylor et al, 2014;Baylor et al, 2017;Baylor et al, 2013;C. Miller, Baylor, Birch, & Yorkston, 2017).…”

Section: Measuring Communicative Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework

Baylor

Darling-White

2020

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health calls on speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to provide care that impacts all aspects of an individual's experience with a communication disorder, including their participation in valued life situations. However, SLPs often report feeling unprepared to implement and document interventions that target life participation. The purpose of this article is to propose a framework to guide participation-focused intervention practices. This age- and disorder-generic framework is designed to be applicable with clients across the variety of settings in which SLPs work. Method In this clinical focus article, we draw on past research and clinical experience to propose a restructuring of World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health components such that participation is the primary focus and outcomes indicator for intervention. In this framework, a specific communicative participation situation is identified and assessed quantitatively, and a corresponding participation-focused goal is established through shared decision making. Following that, assessments are conducted and goals are established in the areas of communication skills, physical and social environments, and personal perspectives. Results The proposed framework provides a concrete organizational structure as well as assessment, goal-writing, and intervention examples to assist SLPs in translating theoretical biopsychosocial frameworks into clinical practices. Conclusions SLPs can and do provide holistic communication services to clients to help them achieve their life participation goals. This article provides an example as to how we can document the need for, as well as the value and impact of our important work, meeting the diverse life participation needs of clients. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12360758

show abstract

Validating the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for use with people with aphasia: an analysis of differential item function (DIF)

Cited by 42 publications

References 40 publications

Relationship between perceived social support and patient‐reported communication outcomes across communication disorders: a systematic review

Relationship between perceived social support and patient‐reported communication outcomes across communication disorders: a systematic review

Exploring the Relevance of Items in the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for Individuals With Hearing Loss

Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About