2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating remotely sensed land surface phenology with leaf out records from a citizen science network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively short time series (21 years) captured substantial interannual variation, but did not allow for robust analysis. While there are other phenology datasets available, we opted for the MODIS‐derived MCDQ12 in spite of its limited time span because of its relatively high degree of accuracy in the boreal biome, based on a comparison with field observations (Purdy et al, 2023). No such field verification was performed on the NDSI measurements used to quantify snow melt cover, but a comparison with independently collected Landsat data shows a strong concordance (98.4%) between the two products (Rittger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively short time series (21 years) captured substantial interannual variation, but did not allow for robust analysis. While there are other phenology datasets available, we opted for the MODIS‐derived MCDQ12 in spite of its limited time span because of its relatively high degree of accuracy in the boreal biome, based on a comparison with field observations (Purdy et al, 2023). No such field verification was performed on the NDSI measurements used to quantify snow melt cover, but a comparison with independently collected Landsat data shows a strong concordance (98.4%) between the two products (Rittger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if there is only one growing season, the variation between the two peaks can be reflected in the fluctuation of the EOS. To date, the dataset has been used to study phenological changes on a global scale [41][42][43], and has shown a high correlation with ground observation data in Alberta [44]. For comparison with this data, we utilized the phenological measurement data from Fujian Province in the earlier literature [45].…”
Section: Phenological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…changes on a global scale [41][42][43], and has shown a high correlation with ground observation data in Alberta [44]. For comparison with this data, we utilized the phenological measurement data from Fujian Province in the earlier literature [45].…”
Section: Thematic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find an appropriate reference data set for phenological comparisons with the Flora Incognita data, which encompasses the same spatial and temporal coverage, remains a challenge (Katal et al, 2023). One future validation avenue could explore the relationship between our macrophenological approach and the macrophenology derived from satellite observations, for example (Purdy et al, 2023;Studer et al, 2007;Tian et al, 2021;Zeng et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2003).…”
Section: Validation and Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%