2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782010005000161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validação interlaboratorial do teste de polarização fluorescente para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina

Abstract: Validação interlaboratorial do teste de polarização fluorescente para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovinaInterlaboratorial validation of the fluorescence polarization assay for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosisRecebido para publicação 11.01

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement of the serological tests used in cattle was median. This difference was mainly due to the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, resulting in a higher prevalence when using the FPA test because it is more sensitive and corroborating with the studies carried out by Nielsen et al (1999) and Mathias et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The agreement of the serological tests used in cattle was median. This difference was mainly due to the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, resulting in a higher prevalence when using the FPA test because it is more sensitive and corroborating with the studies carried out by Nielsen et al (1999) and Mathias et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Foi feita também a interpretação usando um ponto de corte fixo. Para isso, foi adotado o valor de 87,3 mP (MATHIAS et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…According to MARTIN et al (1987) andMATHIAS et al (2010), the gold standard was made up of the combination of CFT and 2-ME. Animals classified as positive in both CFT (titer =20IU) and 2-ME (not vaccinated criteria) were considered to be positive gold standards and negative in both, CFT (titer <20IU) and 2-ME (not vaccinated criteria), were considered to be negative gold standards.…”
Section: Serummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages are related to the initial investment in the equipment and the impossibility, as in the other tests, of differentiating vaccinated from infected animals. Furthermore, if the process is not automated, it will take longer than AAT (MATHIAS, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%