2020
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaginal delivery in SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected pregnant women in Northern Italy: a retrospective analysis

Abstract: Objective To report mode of delivery and immediate neonatal outcome in women infected with COVID-19. Design Retrospective study. Setting Twelve hospitals in northern Italy. Participants Pregnant women with COVID-19-confirmed infection who delivered. Exposure COVID 19 infection in pregnancy. Conclusions Although postpartum infection cannot be excluded with 100% certainty, these findings suggest that vaginal delivery is associated with a low risk of intrapartum SARS-Cov-2 transmission to the newborn.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
348
5
46

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(416 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
17
348
5
46
Order By: Relevance
“…28,30 Although some of the changes to care content and process are consistent with the updated guidelines on essential care provision, 40,71-73 other modifications diverge from available evidence, and could ultimately reverse achieved progress if proper action is not taken. These include the elimination of birth companions altogether, 73,74 reducing or banning visitors to maternity wards, performing caesarean section on all COVID-19 positive women, 74,75 augmenting labour or performing unindicated caesarean sections to gain control over timing of deliveries, separating newborns from COVID-19 positive mothers including not allowing breastfeeding, 76 and drastically reducing length-of-stay after facility birth with fewer home visit follow-ups. 47 These practices could deny women's access to quality, respectful intrapartum and postpartum care, and jeopardize their wellbeing and that of their babies.…”
Section: Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,30 Although some of the changes to care content and process are consistent with the updated guidelines on essential care provision, 40,71-73 other modifications diverge from available evidence, and could ultimately reverse achieved progress if proper action is not taken. These include the elimination of birth companions altogether, 73,74 reducing or banning visitors to maternity wards, performing caesarean section on all COVID-19 positive women, 74,75 augmenting labour or performing unindicated caesarean sections to gain control over timing of deliveries, separating newborns from COVID-19 positive mothers including not allowing breastfeeding, 76 and drastically reducing length-of-stay after facility birth with fewer home visit follow-ups. 47 These practices could deny women's access to quality, respectful intrapartum and postpartum care, and jeopardize their wellbeing and that of their babies.…”
Section: Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmission was reported both in preterm 13,[22][23][24][25] and full-term born infants 23,26 and even where the infection prevention and control measures were in place 13,22,25 . Furthermore, the vertical transmission was reported regardless of the mode of delivery, vaginal 22,27 or cesarean route 13,[23][24][25][26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although direct evidence of viral positive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were mostly negative in large majority of reported studies, the paucity of published data is limited with small cohort numbers , limited sensitivity and speci city of swab tests and rapid evolution of COVID-19 infection. [33][34][35][36]. Hence, more data is needed about the risk of vertical transmission before de nitive conclusions can be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%