Although vaccination has been remarkably effective against some pathogens, for others, rapid antigenic evolution implies that vaccination confers only weak and/or short-lived protection. Consequently, considerable effort has been invested in developing more evolutionarily robust vaccines, either by targeting highly conserved components of the pathogen (universal vaccines) or by including multiple immunological targets within a single vaccine (multi-epitope vaccines). An unexplored third possibility is to vaccinate individuals with one of a number of qualitatively different vaccines, creating a ‘mosaic’ of individual immunity in the population. Here we explore whether? a mosaic vaccination strategy can deliver superior epidemiological outcomes to ‘conventional’ vaccination, in which all individuals receive the same vaccine. We suppose vac-cine doses can be distributed both between distinct vaccine ‘targets’ (e.g., different surface proteins against which an immune response can be generated) and across immunologically-distinct variants at these targets (e.g., strains); the pathogen can undergo antigenic evolution at both targets. Using simple mathematical models, we show that conventional vaccination is often outperformed by mosaic vaccination strategies, that is, mosaic vaccination often leads to fewer infected individuals over the course of the epidemic.