2013 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iceets.2013.6533366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UWB microwave detection of breast cancer using SAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the simulated results experimentally, fabricated MTFPA is coupled to the vector network analyzer (Keysight, ENA‐5063A), which transmits microwaves toward an artificially prepared phantom. To prepare an artificial breast phantom, various options are available in the literature, like gelatin and oil, 21 petroleum jelly and wheat flour, 23 a mixture of safflower oil, formaldehyde with kerosene oil, 37 urethane rubber, and carbon black graphite 38 . In this paper, the tumor‐embedded breast bio‐phantom is prepared with “Agar Powder + Sucrose” (for skin), and this mixture possesses a dielectric constant (ε r ) of 38 and conductivity of 1.46 S/m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the simulated results experimentally, fabricated MTFPA is coupled to the vector network analyzer (Keysight, ENA‐5063A), which transmits microwaves toward an artificially prepared phantom. To prepare an artificial breast phantom, various options are available in the literature, like gelatin and oil, 21 petroleum jelly and wheat flour, 23 a mixture of safflower oil, formaldehyde with kerosene oil, 37 urethane rubber, and carbon black graphite 38 . In this paper, the tumor‐embedded breast bio‐phantom is prepared with “Agar Powder + Sucrose” (for skin), and this mixture possesses a dielectric constant (ε r ) of 38 and conductivity of 1.46 S/m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare an artificial breast phantom, various options are available in the literature, like gelatin and oil, 21 petroleum jelly and wheat flour, 23 a mixture of safflower oil, formaldehyde with kerosene oil, 37 urethane rubber, and carbon black graphite. 38 In this paper, the tumor-embedded breast biophantom is prepared with "Agar Powder + Sucrose" (for skin), and this mixture possesses a dielectric constant (ε r ) of 38 and conductivity of 1.46 S/m. Agar, a yellowish- white powder that molds the dielectric characteristics of artificial tissues and retains them in place, and Sucrose (sugar), a white, crystalline material, while a mixture of agar powder and olive oil with a dielectric constant (ε r ) of 5.28 and conductivity of 0.10 S/m is used for fat layer, where the primary purpose of oil is to create a hydrophobic viscous liquid and odorless powder that is used to significantly tune down relative permittivity while also slightly increasing electrical conductivity to create ATE materials with low water content, and finally, 5 g wheat flour+2.5 g water mixture content of dielectric constant (ε r ) of 23 and conductivity of 2.57 S/m are used to create tumors.…”
Section: Experimental Verification Of the Monostatic Radar-based Tumo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11). Literature survey on breast phantom fabrication techniques shows that phantoms made from oil and gelatin [23, 34], mixture of kerosene oil, safflower oil with formaldehyde [35], carbon black graphite and urethane rubber [36], petroleum jelly and wheat flour [25] are the available choices for breast phantom fabrication. Because of the ease of availability and cost of fabrication, a breast phantom model made from polyethylene material as skin layer, petroleum jelly as the fat layer, and mixture of wheat flour plus water as tumor inside this structure is used in the preparation of prototype of the breast phantom for MWI purpose [25].…”
Section: Design Of a Breast Phantom And Simulation Results: S Parametmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific absorption rate at resonance frequencies of proposed antenna has been performed to check the effect of antenna radiations on the human breast. It has been validated that the proposed antenna retains a harmless radiation that is, below 1.6 W/kg for 1 g of body issue 18 is 0.8 W/kg and 1.1 W/kg at resonance frequency of 6.1 and 10.8 GHz, respectively. The details about the experimental procedure done for breast cancer detection using RBMI are explained in the next subsection.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of Usage Of the Proposed Dra For Rbmmentioning
confidence: 91%