1933
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1933.00830010213004
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Uveal Pigment

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
25
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
3
0
0

Year Published

Range
1934
1934
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
24
2

Relationship

0
26

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 26 publications

(3 citation statements)
references

References 6 publications

0
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Several authors reported cases of suspected SO following enucleation of the exciting eye even when the injured was excised as early as 48 h post-injury. 136,144–150 More recently, Bellan 3 described a case of SO despite having the ruptured globe removed 5 days postinjury and challenged the concept that enucleation within 14 days eliminates the risk of SO. He also made some calculations based on 10,000 theoretical patients with penetrating ocular injury.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of 136 case studies (from Fuchs, Joy, Verhoeff, and Woods) there was only one instance of SO developing when the exciting eye had been enucleated within 2 weeks after injury. 136,146–149…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be a low estimate since the worst reported responses to treatment were used for all calculations, and there was an assumption that enucleation within 2 weeks was completely protective of SO which it is not. 3,136,144–152 Bellan 3 suggested prophylactic enucleation of an unsalvageable eye following perforating injury should not be mandatory. In another review by Brackup et al 153 50 patients, with severe globe rupture and visual acuities of less than or equal to hand motion did not have the injured eye removed within 2 weeks to prevent SO.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations