2003
DOI: 10.1097/00005382-200310000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Simple Radiation Dose Measurements in the Evaluation of Different CT Scanners Used for High-Resolution CT

Abstract: In recent years radiation risk from CT scanning has become an important area of investigation. Many authors have suggested that radiation dose can be decreased without loss of diagnostic information. This dose reduction has primarily been achieved through a decrease in tube current. An area that has received little attention has been variations in dose from different CT scanners. To evaluate this aspect of radiation exposure, we measured the radiation dose of 4 different CT scanners. We found that the radiatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because scanner model and technical factors have a known effect on absolute exposure, individual %CV values were always calculated from measurements collected at the same technical factors ͑bowtie filter, kVp, and collimation͒ on the same make and model of scanner. 13,14 In the upper tier, individual %CVs were pooled within each precision type ͓i.e., between-run ͑weekly͒ precision͔, scanner model, and dosimetry metric ͑i.e., CTDI 100,air ͒ to calculate the median and range. The median and range of %CV values were reported rather than an average and confidence interval because the presence of potential outliers was detected within the pooled data sets.…”
Section: Iib Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because scanner model and technical factors have a known effect on absolute exposure, individual %CV values were always calculated from measurements collected at the same technical factors ͑bowtie filter, kVp, and collimation͒ on the same make and model of scanner. 13,14 In the upper tier, individual %CVs were pooled within each precision type ͓i.e., between-run ͑weekly͒ precision͔, scanner model, and dosimetry metric ͑i.e., CTDI 100,air ͒ to calculate the median and range. The median and range of %CV values were reported rather than an average and confidence interval because the presence of potential outliers was detected within the pooled data sets.…”
Section: Iib Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%