2004
DOI: 10.5751/es-01206-090211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Species–Area Relationship to Set Baseline Targets for Conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Species-area approaches to conservation planning emphasize that the rate of extinctions from a habitat accelerates as it declines in area, placing a premium on minimizing further loss in already small habitat fragments (Desmet & Cowling 2004). However, our results suggest that such approaches could be misleading in areas where substantial intact landscapes remain, because the rate of habitat clearance accelerates dramatically once threatening processes penetrate intact areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Species-area approaches to conservation planning emphasize that the rate of extinctions from a habitat accelerates as it declines in area, placing a premium on minimizing further loss in already small habitat fragments (Desmet & Cowling 2004). However, our results suggest that such approaches could be misleading in areas where substantial intact landscapes remain, because the rate of habitat clearance accelerates dramatically once threatening processes penetrate intact areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Discordance results firstly from the species sampling that were on the mainland landmass prior to sea level ascend (Gillespie & Roderick, 2002). After fragmenta-tion, this produces an impoverishment (or relaxation) that may be accentuated by subsequent extinction and failure of the species to recolonize (Powell & Wagner, 1993;González, 2000;Desmet & Cowling, 2004). Another factor to explain the hosts/inquiline impoverishment may be related with climatic variations through time, which could affect the composition and occurrence of aquatic insects, dropping the initial diversity to few species with better adaptative plasticity (Gillespie & Roderick, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method developed by Desmet and Cowling (2004) that is based on the species-area relationship was therefore used to calculate conservation targets for the 12 vegetation types, expressed as the percentage of the original extent of the vegetation type required to represent 80% of the associated species. Ranging between 8% for Clay Grassland and 27% for Norite Koppies Bushveld (Table 2), these conservation targets compare favourably with those recommended in the conservation literature, which range between 12% and 75% (Cowling & Heijnis 2001).…”
Section: Coarse Filter Biodiversity Surrogates Mapping and Target Setmentioning
confidence: 99%