2015
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the GORE® Septal Occluder (GSO) in Challenging Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Anatomies

Abstract: The Gore(®) Septal Occluder is an efficient device for patent foramen ovale closure in challenging anatomies, including long-tunnel PFOs and atrial septal aneurysms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning mid‐term complications after PFO closure with the GSO device, some cases of new onset atrial arrhythmias—mostly atrial fibrillation —and palpitations due to ectopic supraventricular beats or without a documented arrhythmia have been described . This is in agreement with the results of our patient cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning mid‐term complications after PFO closure with the GSO device, some cases of new onset atrial arrhythmias—mostly atrial fibrillation —and palpitations due to ectopic supraventricular beats or without a documented arrhythmia have been described . This is in agreement with the results of our patient cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared with implantation data from the RESPECT trial using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder (St. Jude Medical, Plymouth, MN) (procedure time 51.9 ± 28.6 min, fluoroscopy time 11.8 ± 8.9 min), implantation and radiation times in the present study are considerably shorter (procedure time 41 ± 25 min and fluoroscopy time: 5.6 ± 4.7 min) . The data of this multicenter trial are comparable to other studies applying the GSO device for PFO closure (range of mean procedure times 30 ± 20 min to 47 ± 12 min; range of mean fluoroscopy time 3.0 ± 1.7min to 6.9 ± 2.7 min) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the medical treatment therapy compared to PFO occlusion results in life long antiplatelet or oral anticoagulation therapy, interventional closure is considered reasonable by numerous physicians. Post interventional closure rates differ depending on the device used and have been described between 86 and 96 % [911, 13, 14]. The Amplatzer TM PFO Occluder (ST Jude Medical TM , Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA) is probable the most widely used occluder device and was recently studied in the two large multi-center RESPECT and PC trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Amplatzer TM PFO Occluder (ST Jude Medical TM , Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA) is probable the most widely used occluder device and was recently studied in the two large multi-center RESPECT and PC trials. Other devices like the GORE ® HELEX ® (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Newark, Delaware, USA), Nit-Occlud ® PFO (pfm medical ag, Cologne, Germany), Cardi-O-Fix PFO Occluder (Starway Medical Technology, Inc, Beijing, China) and CeraFlex TM PFO Occluder (Carlsbad, California, USA) are available [9, 11, 14–17]. Some devices such as the STARFlex ® (NMT Medical, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA), studied in the CLOSURE I Trial have disappeared from the market [10, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%