2017
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201600222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using predictions from a joint model for longitudinal and survival data to inform the optimal time of intervention in an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme

Abstract: Joint models of longitudinal and survival data can be used to predict the risk of a future event occurring based on the evolution of an endogenous biomarker measured repeatedly over time. This has led naturally to the use of dynamic predictions that update each time a new longitudinal measurement is provided. In this paper, we show how such predictions can be utilised within a fuller decision modelling framework, in particular to allow planning of future interventions for patients under a ‘watchful waiting’ ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lcmm R package for JLCMs, frailtypack R package for JFMs. Time-varying effects [ 13 ], Bayesian moving average [ 53 , 107 ], various functions of random effects [ 13 , 53 , 73 75 , 113 ], third JM to handle missing data and cure fraction models [ 66 , 114 116 ]. Shared random effects JM employed for real-time predictions of prostate cancer recurrence [ 74 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lcmm R package for JLCMs, frailtypack R package for JFMs. Time-varying effects [ 13 ], Bayesian moving average [ 53 , 107 ], various functions of random effects [ 13 , 53 , 73 75 , 113 ], third JM to handle missing data and cure fraction models [ 66 , 114 116 ]. Shared random effects JM employed for real-time predictions of prostate cancer recurrence [ 74 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches to individualised dynamic prediction include stacking and pseudo-BMA [23]; and landmarking [24]. A number of other papers have also compared prediction models for dynamic prediction [25]; [26]; [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%