2002 IEEE 33rd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37289)
DOI: 10.1109/psec.2002.1022554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using on-line parameter estimation to improve efficiency of IPM machine drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same figure also compares different MTPA curves obtained offline, based on various methods, namely torque measurements, flux maps and flux approximations (polynomial, "linear+saturation" [120] and constant inductance) for an IPMSM. As already shown in [95], the torque vs. current characteristic is a convenient way for comparing the effectiveness of different MTPA solutions, since it clearly reveals how a non-optimal MTPA trajectory results in loss of available torque (at a certain maximum current) and excess of current needed (for obtaining a certain torque). On the other hand, simple comparison between trajectories on the 𝐼 𝑑 𝐼 π‘ž plane (Fig.…”
Section: B Extremum Seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same figure also compares different MTPA curves obtained offline, based on various methods, namely torque measurements, flux maps and flux approximations (polynomial, "linear+saturation" [120] and constant inductance) for an IPMSM. As already shown in [95], the torque vs. current characteristic is a convenient way for comparing the effectiveness of different MTPA solutions, since it clearly reveals how a non-optimal MTPA trajectory results in loss of available torque (at a certain maximum current) and excess of current needed (for obtaining a certain torque). On the other hand, simple comparison between trajectories on the 𝐼 𝑑 𝐼 π‘ž plane (Fig.…”
Section: B Extremum Seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach to the adaptation of MTPA trajectory during normal operation is based on parameters estimation [3,[95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102]. In this case, the MTPA operating point is determined analytically, applying traditional formulae e.g., (10), but the parameter values (𝐿 𝑑 , 𝐿 π‘ž , Ξ› π‘šπ‘” ) are estimated online (based on signals measured by the controller).…”
Section: A Parameters Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the output of the velocity loop is selected as the reference for compensating the dq axis vector synthesized current. These two terms are defined by (9). The performance criterion J is then defined as (10) where the summation is carried out over all patterns in a given set S. The gradient of the performance function with respect to W is computed as βˆ‡ W and W is adjusted along the negative gradient as (11).…”
Section: B Nn Compensator Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter estimation methods [6], [7] require knowledge of certain parameter relationships and may not be accurate in highly saturated motors. Signal injection methods [8], [9] are effective only in low-noise environments and may introduce additional small losses to the system. Perturb and observation methods [10] are sensitive to changes in the load and are limited to steady-state conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%