2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using machine learning to predict soil bulk density on the basis of visual parameters: Tools for in-field and post-field evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many positive examples of using data mining techniques for building predictive models in the field of agricultural and environmental sciences (Bondi et al 2018;Bui et al 2009;Debeljak et al 2007Debeljak et al , 2008Goldstein et al 2017;Kuzmanovski et al 2015;Shekoofa et al 2014;Trajanov 2011). Their biggest advantage is that they are applied on easily obtainable empirical data, and the parametrization of the data mining models is done automatically from the data; hence it is not influenced by the subjectivity of the modelers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many positive examples of using data mining techniques for building predictive models in the field of agricultural and environmental sciences (Bondi et al 2018;Bui et al 2009;Debeljak et al 2007Debeljak et al , 2008Goldstein et al 2017;Kuzmanovski et al 2015;Shekoofa et al 2014;Trajanov 2011). Their biggest advantage is that they are applied on easily obtainable empirical data, and the parametrization of the data mining models is done automatically from the data; hence it is not influenced by the subjectivity of the modelers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter is often used in agronomic studies, as it indicates the presence of compacted layers. As such, it is commonly considered as a suitable trait for efficient measurement of soil carbon and nutrient stocks (Bondi et al, 2018). There is only little knowledge about bulk density, since the measurement of this parameter is demanding, as it is pointed out in the work by Premrov et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can partly be solved by weighing the different responses, as by Rutgers et al (2012). Machine learning is an alternative way of obtaining domain knowledge from empirical data (Trajanov et al, 2015(Trajanov et al, , 2018Idé, 2016;Bondi et al, 2018). Machine learning algorithms for rule and tree induction are a useful framework for extracting knowledge from data and representing it in a format that can be directly used in constructing decision support models.…”
Section: Combining Expert Knowledge With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes important attributes that can be used to optimize predictions, such as on primary productivity. Machine learning has now been utilized (i) to predict single soil attributes or study what governs them (Hobley et al, 2015;Hobley and Wilson, 2016;Chang et al, 2017;Bondi et al, 2018), (ii) for continental or even global soil property predictions (Henderson et al, 2005;Hashimoto et al, 2017;Hengl et al, 2017), and (iii) to classify soils in digital soil mapping (McBratney et al, 2003;Heung et al, 2016). Trajanov et al (2018) successfully used data mining to generate predictive models that identify the key factors governing primary productivity (r > 0.80).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%