2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using health insurance reimbursement data to identify incident cancer cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the MIS-CASS is a real population level cancer surveillance system with >95% coverage on a national scale, which is distinct from health insurance systems in some western countries such as Medicare and the Ontario Health Insurance Plan [32,33]. Second, the original claims data of MIS-CASS is of high quality [17], as the diagnostic information is entered by professionals in qualified medical institutions and verified by officials from medical insurance managing departments. Third, the proportion of cancer cases missed by the MIS-CASS is low, based on our two previous individual level comparative evaluation studies [16À18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the MIS-CASS is a real population level cancer surveillance system with >95% coverage on a national scale, which is distinct from health insurance systems in some western countries such as Medicare and the Ontario Health Insurance Plan [32,33]. Second, the original claims data of MIS-CASS is of high quality [17], as the diagnostic information is entered by professionals in qualified medical institutions and verified by officials from medical insurance managing departments. Third, the proportion of cancer cases missed by the MIS-CASS is low, based on our two previous individual level comparative evaluation studies [16À18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of claims data per se determines the accuracy and completeness of collecting cancer cases, and two of our preceding studies have addressed this issue. In one study we compared active follow-up (door-to-door interviews) with passive linkage with NCMS claims data for identification of incident cancer cases in a large-scale randomized controlled trial involving 33,948 subjects from 2012 to 2017, and found that the overall sensitivity of passive linkage with NCMS claims data was significantly higher than that of active followup (95¢6% vs 54¢9%, p < 0¢001) [17]. In another study, we further verified claims-based diagnoses with corresponding electronic medical records at an individual level in the general population in Hua County in 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients insured by NCMS, diagnosis-related information for each inpatient visit is entered and stored in the medical insurance system once the reimbursement process is completed, which makes it theoretically feasible to identify hospitalized cancer patients. A recent study used NCMS claims data as one means of following up subjects in a screening trial cohort for newly diagnosed cancer cases, supporting the potential of NCMS-claims-based cancer incidence surveillance (17). However, before general application of this method, evaluating the accuracy of cancer diagnoses in NCMS claims at the individual level based on real-world cancer patients’ data in a larger population is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, information regarding the clinical treatment regimen of the participants was collected with linkage to claims data from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS), which is a government-run health insurance program in rural China with coverage of nearly 100% in the study area that had previously proved to be a reliable data source regarding cancer diagnosis and treatment. [13] , [14] , [15] Detailed claims records from the NCMS for all participants from January 2012 to September 2017 were carefully reviewed to confirm whether they had received cancer-related therapy, which included endoscopic therapy, radical surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%