Using Consensus Analysis to Assess Mental Models about Water Use and Management in the Crocodile River Catchment, South Africa

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The content, structure, and distribution of mental models can be elicited and measured using a variety of methods. In this article we explore a method for eliciting mental models within the context of water use and management in South Africa. This method is consensus analysis, a technique developed in cognitive anthropology. We used it to analyze qualitative data from semistructured interviews, pilesorts, and questionnaires to test quantitatively the degree of sharing and diversity of mental models within and across social groups. The consensus analysis method focused on comparing the mental models of two key stakeholder groups in the Crocodile River catchment in South Africa, i.e., conservationists and irrigators, to better understand the level of consensus between these groups. We specifically investigated the level of agreement regarding: (1) major water users of the Crocodile River, (2) causes of the current problems with flows in the river, (3) consequences of the river not flowing, and 4) priorities for future use. We discuss the results and examine the strengths and challenges of consensus analysis for eliciting and measuring mental models. We also evaluated the usefulness of this method in assisting natural resource managers to identify strategies for improving integrated management of water resources.

Using Participatory Scenarios to Stimulate Social Learning for Collaborative Sustainable Development

“…Extended social learning research efforts such as the Harmonizing Collaborative Planning (HarmoniCOP) projects (Tippett et al 2005) and Social Learning for Integrated Managing (SLIM) projects (Steyaert and Jiggins 2007) used analysis of completed project documents, information about changes in environmental policies and practices, and the emergence of new organizations as evidence of social learning. Longer engagement with participants also could allow iterative collection of survey or other data, enabling analysis of potential changes in participants' perspectives or identification of emerging consensus (e.g., Stone-Jovicich et al 2011). However, it could be problematic to attribute social learning outcomes to a particular process rather than to other incidental and independent factors.…”

Eliciting Mental Models: a Comparison of Interview Procedures in the Context of Natural Resource Management

“…A "nonsituated" procedure involves eliciting a person's mental model in a location removed from the phenomena of interest. The majority of mental model elicitation procedures are conducted as a nonsituated interview , Stone-Jovicich et al 2011. That is, mental models are typically elicited in a setting that is convenient for the interviewer and/or interviewee, such as in the participant's home, but not particularly relevant to the topic of the interview.…”

“…NRM researchers and practitioners are particularly interested in gaining insight into the cognitive structures that frame peoples' interactions with complex and dynamic environments and exploring how these structures may differ between individuals and social groups (Abel et al 1998, Özesmi and Özesmi 2004, Dray et al 2006, Baynes et al 2011, Stone-Jovicich et al 2011, Lynam et al 2012). The mental model construct has been identified as a suitable means for examining cognition in the context of NRM because it captures how people dynamically conceive environmental systems to function.…”

Linking knowledge and action through mental models of sustainable agriculture

“…The CA approach relies on similar data-collection techniques to elicit a group mental model that captures stakeholders' beliefs and values pertaining to how the social-ecological system should be managed and for what purpose (23). The mental models are then analyzed using quantitative methods to assess agreement among individuals and identify points for consensus.…”