2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Computer-Aided Design Paper Model for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Preliminary Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Osteotomy of DCIA flap, introduced by Taylor and Watson [ 11 ] in 1978, requires a long operative time to obtain the desired curvature of neomandible and increases the risk of injury to the vascular pedicle, especially for surgeons without much experience. Mandibular reconstruction using virtual surgery planning and stereolithographic surgical guides is a recent introduction, especially in fibula free flaps [ 7 9 , 12 ], but, there are few reports with DCIA flap. However, current literature still relies on the surgeon’s experience to prevent errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Osteotomy of DCIA flap, introduced by Taylor and Watson [ 11 ] in 1978, requires a long operative time to obtain the desired curvature of neomandible and increases the risk of injury to the vascular pedicle, especially for surgeons without much experience. Mandibular reconstruction using virtual surgery planning and stereolithographic surgical guides is a recent introduction, especially in fibula free flaps [ 7 9 , 12 ], but, there are few reports with DCIA flap. However, current literature still relies on the surgeon’s experience to prevent errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current literature still relies on the surgeon’s experience to prevent errors. For example, although a virtual surgery planning is successfully implemented and a pre-bent reconstruction plate is prepared for the neomandible, to make the 3D shape of the neomandible using fibular or iliac bone flap is dependent on the surgeon’s experience [ 12 , 13 ] or the mirror image of the opposite side of the mandible [ 14 ] without surgical guides, not considering individual characteristics. Otherwise the reconstruction plate is pre-bent following the native mandible, rather than the neomandible, so it is difficult to achieve close contact between the reconstruction plate and bone flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] However, the clinical implications and economic benefits have yet to be formally analyzed with the added cost of VSP-CAD/CAM in the context of various expanding clinical applications including trauma, temporomandibular joint reconstruction, cancer, and skull base surgery. [6,28,35,38] In head and neck cancer reconstruction, patient lifespan, risk for tumor recurrence and disease progression, and quality of life are additional factors that add complexity to the costbenefit evaluation of the technology in an oncologic setting.…”
Section: Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutting planning may be useless if the discrepancy between the true cut and the prediction is large. Some researchers provided mechanisms (Strackee, 2004) or paper models (Wang, 2009) to record dimensions of the defect section to assist the osteotomy. However, those approaches require assistantship from technicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%