2013 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icpc.2013.6613840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using code ownership to improve IR-based Traceability Link Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Requirements‐to‐code traceability and the activity of retrieving them, often referred to as feature location , also received considerable attention by the scientific community. Information retrieval (IR), perhaps to date the most widely applied and studied technology in the traceability community, identifies traces based on naming similarities between source code and other software artifacts, like requirements . However, an important issue hindering the performance of IR techniques when applied to the recovery of traceability is the problem of vocabulary mismatch between source and target artifacts (like requirements and code).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Requirements‐to‐code traceability and the activity of retrieving them, often referred to as feature location , also received considerable attention by the scientific community. Information retrieval (IR), perhaps to date the most widely applied and studied technology in the traceability community, identifies traces based on naming similarities between source code and other software artifacts, like requirements . However, an important issue hindering the performance of IR techniques when applied to the recovery of traceability is the problem of vocabulary mismatch between source and target artifacts (like requirements and code).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diaz et al . introduced additional ‘author contexts’ from code to improve IR‐based traceability links recovery. They find all code snippets that are commented by each author of the code based on Javadoc‐style comments and generate so‐called ‘author contexts’.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diaz et al [14] capture relationships between source code artifacts to improve the recovery of traceability links between documentation and source code. They extract the author of each source code component and, for each author, identify the \context" she/he worked on.…”
Section: Source Code-to-documentation Traceability Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali et al [22] proposed an approach to establish and maintain traceability links between source codes and software requirements to improve the precision and recall of information retrieval (IR) techniques by discarding/re-ranking the reported links from IR based on the outcome links that are generated from software repositories. Diaz, Diana, et al [23] proposed an approach that purifies the noise from the candidate links list generated by IR technique. This approach leverages the code ownership to improve the traceability link recovery.…”
Section: Information Retrieval Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the categories are matched at this level (i.e. current level) then we increment the similarity score by the value of I (line [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Consider for example that the subject Florida is in artifact 1 and the artifact 2, has the subject Arizona.…”
Section: Inference Modulementioning
confidence: 99%