Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design 2011
DOI: 10.5220/0004458800800087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ahm Approach to Position Codp

Abstract: The concept of Customer Order Decoupling Point/CODP is a popular approach to increasing the diversity of end items, while taking advantage of standardization/unification due to increased repetitiveness of operations devoted to components and/or subassemblies manufacturing. CODP marks the place (the operation, the phase of the process etc.) where customer intervention occurs, in order to define, according to his/her wishes, the final mode of the end item (product or service). An underlying issue here is to make… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present paper, we propose such a model for PM, which helps in defining the places in the project process where the interaction with the customer is to be realized, as well as the ways by which it is done. It is also a further development of some ideas, presented in Panayotova and Andreev (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present paper, we propose such a model for PM, which helps in defining the places in the project process where the interaction with the customer is to be realized, as well as the ways by which it is done. It is also a further development of some ideas, presented in Panayotova and Andreev (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A more thorough study of the literature worldwide in this context shows that the majority of authors (Browning & Eppinger, 2002;McCord & Eppinger, 1993;Panayotova, 2005;Panayotova & Andreev, 2011;Steward, 1981; and so on) are considering the task relationships as depicted on following 3 types (see Figure 2): a) No link / dependence between tasks (both tasks are independent from each other); b) Sequential / one-way dependence (e.g. task B needs the result of / information from task A); c) Two-way dependence or interdependence -both tasks use each other's results / information -iteration process (cycle).…”
Section: A Critique On Design Structure Matrix As a Project Managemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each organization should develop indicators that meet the specificities of its activities. (Panayotova et al, 2011)…”
Section: Degree Of Compliance With Consumer Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%