2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using advanced dispersion models and mobile monitoring to characterize spatial patterns of ultrafine particles in an urban area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that the shape of street level particle number distributions was similar for the selected heights (due to the slow transformation processes) with consistent decrease in the number concentration per size mode. Wang et al (2008) and Zwack et al (2011) modelled the dispersion of traffic emitted UFP (total number of particles) in a neighbourhood scale, showing that the concentration decays exponentially with distance. This is also confirmed by the measurements by Zhu et al (2009), showing that the UFP concentration decayed exponentially with increasing distances with sharp concentration gradients observed within 100-150 m from the roadway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the shape of street level particle number distributions was similar for the selected heights (due to the slow transformation processes) with consistent decrease in the number concentration per size mode. Wang et al (2008) and Zwack et al (2011) modelled the dispersion of traffic emitted UFP (total number of particles) in a neighbourhood scale, showing that the concentration decays exponentially with distance. This is also confirmed by the measurements by Zhu et al (2009), showing that the UFP concentration decayed exponentially with increasing distances with sharp concentration gradients observed within 100-150 m from the roadway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently, the spatial variability of UFP concentrations depends on the spatial proximity to sources (Zhu et al, 2002) but also the dispersion conditions governed by topography, current wind speed and direction, and temperature inversions (Birmili et al, 2009a;Zwack et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile measurements are performed with different platforms, e.g. pedestrians (Zwack et al, 2011a), bicycles (Berghmans et al, 2009;Boogaard et al, 2009;Peters et al, 2013;Sullivan and Pryor, 2014), trams (Hagemann et al, 2014;Hasenfratz et al, 2014) and cars (Westerdahl et al, 2005;Hu et al, 2012;Hudda et al, 2014). Mobile measurements are used for a range of different purposes, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile measurements are used for a range of different purposes, e.g. to assess personal exposure by equipping the study object with a portable monitor (Berghmans et al, 2009;Boogaard et al, 2009;Dons et al, 2011;SpiraCohen et al, 2010), to assess the exposure in different modes of transport (Kaur et al, 2005;Int Panis et al, 2010;Kingham et al, 2013), to study spatial variation in air pollution (Weijers et al, 2004;Zwack et al, 2011c;MacNaughton et al, 2014), to investigate seasonal and regional variation (Bukowiecki et al, 2003), to study spatio-temporal correlation with noise (Weber, 2009), or to develop and validate air quality models (Zwack et al, 2011a;Merbitz et al, 2012). Other studies address the potential of using mobile measurements to construct air pollution maps at a high spatial resolution (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%