2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-017-0537-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a gradient in food quality to infer drivers of fatty acid content in two filter-feeding aquatic consumers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason that dreissenid mussels were generally avoided by round gobies may be because the invasive mussels are characterised by a hard shell with byssal threads that can increase the round goby handling time compared to benthic prey, such as Gastropoda, which have a thinner shell and lack of attachment making them a more energetically profitable prey (Kipp et al., 2012). Also, dreissenid mussels can accumulate a lesser total amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids and be of lower nutritional value compared to other macroinvertebrates (Larson et al., 2017). Round gobies may not have been able to spend additional energy diverting to pelagic prey, such as visually hunting for crustacean zooplankton and handling dreissenid mussels, at low water‐conductivity sites and opted for easily available benthic prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason that dreissenid mussels were generally avoided by round gobies may be because the invasive mussels are characterised by a hard shell with byssal threads that can increase the round goby handling time compared to benthic prey, such as Gastropoda, which have a thinner shell and lack of attachment making them a more energetically profitable prey (Kipp et al., 2012). Also, dreissenid mussels can accumulate a lesser total amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids and be of lower nutritional value compared to other macroinvertebrates (Larson et al., 2017). Round gobies may not have been able to spend additional energy diverting to pelagic prey, such as visually hunting for crustacean zooplankton and handling dreissenid mussels, at low water‐conductivity sites and opted for easily available benthic prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As HUFAs are vital for organismal functioning, they are bio‐accumulated, preferentially stored, and spared in fat burning as compared to other FAs (Twining et al ., 2016). As a result, carnivores are expected to be less prone to HUFA deficiencies compared to first‐order consumers (Larson et al ., 2017). Animals that have diets typically rich in HUFAs and/or DHA have poor to no capacity to make these compounds from PUFA precursors (Twining et al ., 2016), including aquatic first‐order consumers like Daphnia (Larson et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Essential Micronutrients Responses To Increased N Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, carnivores are expected to be less prone to HUFA deficiencies compared to first‐order consumers (Larson et al ., 2017). Animals that have diets typically rich in HUFAs and/or DHA have poor to no capacity to make these compounds from PUFA precursors (Twining et al ., 2016), including aquatic first‐order consumers like Daphnia (Larson et al ., 2017). If N deposition promotes protein synthesis and cellular growth, thereby increasing HUFA demand, this may lead to HUFA deficiencies, particularly in aquatic consumers, which will be aggravated when N deposition favours low‐HUFA‐containing species like diatoms (Gomes et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Essential Micronutrients Responses To Increased N Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%