2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this paper described how the three visual feedback levels (from low to high) can affect driver's trust level. However, recent research (Ulahannan et al, 2020a;Ulahannan et al, 2020b) have suggested that different people preferred different information types (High Information Preference and Low Information Preference). Ulahannan et al's (2020a) study highlighted that presenting different types of feedback information (status vs intent) can impact on drivers' trust level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this paper described how the three visual feedback levels (from low to high) can affect driver's trust level. However, recent research (Ulahannan et al, 2020a;Ulahannan et al, 2020b) have suggested that different people preferred different information types (High Information Preference and Low Information Preference). Ulahannan et al's (2020a) study highlighted that presenting different types of feedback information (status vs intent) can impact on drivers' trust level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verberne et al (2012) suggest that providing feedback of the current automation status to the environment can potentially increase the level of trust in the driver. However, providing the right level of feedback for each user within an automated vehicle is also essential, as different users will have different information expectations and preferences (Ulahannan et al, 2020b). The findings suggested that it is essential for the drivers to understand what the vehicle is doing and why, and keeping the drivers informed about the vehicle's condition is significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the preference of the driver's level of information acceptance, the information displayed in the HUD may receive a negative response. To address this, an adaptable interface design should be introduced to take into account the factors that can inspire user experience by considering those who prefer low information acceptance [57,58]. The adaptable interface design can be appropriately considered for intuitiveness and safety, which familiarizes the driver with the context for vehicle information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, driving simulation can be used to test the interaction between fully autonomous vehicles and passengers. In [118], the authors investigate the preference of passengers regarding the level of information the autonomous system exchanges, such as sensor information, directions, and status. This study points out that different users will require different levels of information, which should be accounted for when designing autonomous systems.…”
Section: B Autonomous Systems Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%