2015
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1165-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of terrestrial laser scanning to evaluate the spatial distribution of soil disturbance by skidding operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 -Results of MANOVA (mean ± standard deviation) to evaluate differences in soil parameters between trails used by different logging vehicles (Wilks test's F = 42.33,p < 0.001 logging, comparable with results obtained by point cloud derived by TLS (Koren et al 2015). The use of a consumer reflex camera combined with the use of SfM software, however, can produce accuracy models at low cost, with respect to the use of TLS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3 -Results of MANOVA (mean ± standard deviation) to evaluate differences in soil parameters between trails used by different logging vehicles (Wilks test's F = 42.33,p < 0.001 logging, comparable with results obtained by point cloud derived by TLS (Koren et al 2015). The use of a consumer reflex camera combined with the use of SfM software, however, can produce accuracy models at low cost, with respect to the use of TLS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a consumer reflex camera combined with the use of SfM software, however, can produce accuracy models at low cost, with respect to the use of TLS. The use of this methodology (Pierzchala et al 2014, Koren et al 2015 can produce information along the entire trail, not only at the sampling points. This information is very important for forest managers, as it allows for monitoring of soil ecosystems after forest operations and planning of soil recovery practices (Pinard et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations