2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Smart Toe© implant for small toe arthrodesis: A smart concept?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiographic fusion rate of 88% at 26 weeks’ follow-up with the fiber-reinforced implant is consistent with the higher end of published fusion rates for other intramedullary PIP joint implants. 2,9,10,12,16 -18,22,23,26,27,34,35,39 -42,45 Three studies of absorbable intramedullary implants in PIP joint arthrodesis reported fusion rates of 79%, 26 83%, 27 and 85%. 45 In 8 studies of intramedullary nitinol implants for PIP joint arthrodesis to correct hammertoe deformity, fusion rates ranged from 44% 34 to 100%, 2 and averaged around 79%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiographic fusion rate of 88% at 26 weeks’ follow-up with the fiber-reinforced implant is consistent with the higher end of published fusion rates for other intramedullary PIP joint implants. 2,9,10,12,16 -18,22,23,26,27,34,35,39 -42,45 Three studies of absorbable intramedullary implants in PIP joint arthrodesis reported fusion rates of 79%, 26 83%, 27 and 85%. 45 In 8 studies of intramedullary nitinol implants for PIP joint arthrodesis to correct hammertoe deformity, fusion rates ranged from 44% 34 to 100%, 2 and averaged around 79%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is imperative to have everything ready beforehand. 15 Scholl et al 28 hypothesized that another possible reason for Smart Toe breakage could be the length of the selected With regards to the K-wire, arguments against its use typically focus on complications associated with the pins. Pin-tract infection is the most commonly cited pin-related complication.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Many studies argue that intramedullary implants reduce K-wire complications. 1,7,[14][15][16] The aim of this study was to analyze functional outcomes in patients who had undergone proximal interphalangeal joint fusion using 2 types of intramedullary implants, the Smart Toe and the TenFuse, and to compare them with the outcomes in patients treated with standard K-wire temporary fixation. The hypothesis was that intramedullary implants would offer superior fixation, less pain, fewer complications, and superior rates of arthrodesis than K-wires.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Intramedullary devices can also be used instead of a wire. 54 For patients with significant ulceration, terminalisation is an alternative to fusion. Our proposed algorithm is illustrated in Figure 6.…”
Section: Operative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%