2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of response surface methodology for optimization of fluoride adsorption in an aqueous solution by Brushite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
113
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
113
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The desirability value ranged between 0 and 1, where a value of 1 is perfect, i.e., the ideal parameter value [22]. The optimizing desirability of transfersome luteolin was 0.609.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desirability value ranged between 0 and 1, where a value of 1 is perfect, i.e., the ideal parameter value [22]. The optimizing desirability of transfersome luteolin was 0.609.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5 having positive signs, showing that the SP removal increases when the sample dosage increase for DMSP and when left to stir for longer time for ODSP. A positive value represents an effect that favors the optimization, while a negative value indicates an inverse relationship between the factors and the response [25]. For DMSP and ODSP in BRE, significant effect were obtained for linear terms of coagulant dosage ( ), pH ( ) and stirring time ( ) while the interaction effect is on and .…”
Section: Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The use of ANOVA enables the comparison between the variations that arise from the treatment of the experimental data and the variation as a result of the random errors that accompanied the measurement of the obtained responses [28]. Moreover, the ANOVA helps to determine the significance and the mathematical model adequacy [28]. Besides ANOVA, other tools such as normality test, regression analysis and lack of fit test can be employed to examine the model adequacy of the RSM optimization.…”
Section: Statistical Approaches With Emphasis On Design Of Experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by employing the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The use of ANOVA enables the comparison between the variations that arise from the treatment of the experimental data and the variation as a result of the random errors that accompanied the measurement of the obtained responses [28]. Moreover, the ANOVA helps to determine the significance and the mathematical model adequacy [28].…”
Section: Statistical Approaches With Emphasis On Design Of Experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%