2006
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.142.3.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Polylactic Acid Implants to Correct Facial Lipoatrophy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1–Positive Individuals Receiving Combination Antiretroviral Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
40
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(19 reference statements)
7
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes, while lower than the week 48 changes reported in some studies [9,11,17], are comparable to those reported in others [13,14]. However, cross-study comparisons of PLA efficacy for HIV facial lipoatrophy are problematic because of the heterogeneity of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These changes, while lower than the week 48 changes reported in some studies [9,11,17], are comparable to those reported in others [13,14]. However, cross-study comparisons of PLA efficacy for HIV facial lipoatrophy are problematic because of the heterogeneity of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Validated measures of facial soft tissue thickness or volume for assessing and/or comparing treatment efficacy are also lacking. Measurement methods employed have included ultrasonography [9,14,17], callipers [11], and 3D photography with 3D computerized reconstruction of the face [13], none of which has been validated. Collectively, these factors demonstrate the lack of scientifically valid data that relate Table 2 Overall procedure/product-related adverse events to week 48 to this treatment approach, and assist in explaining the broad inter-study variability in PLA treatment outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] A description of the semipermanent and permanent dermal filler products within these studies is provided in Table 3. Autologous fat transfer (AFT) was used as a comparator in three studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22] There were substantial differences in study design within the included studies which prevented statistical pooling. One study 9 compared patients who had been treated to those who had not, other studies compared different treatments in separate patient groups, 10,11 and others compared changes from baseline for a single intervention 13,14,[16][17][18][19] or several interventions. 12 One study reported outcomes for patients who had complete correction of lipoatrophy after treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%