2008
DOI: 10.1002/met.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of high‐resolution NWP rainfall and river flow forecasts for advance warning of the Carlisle flood, north‐west England

Abstract: ABSTRACT:On the 8 January 2005 the city of Carlisle in north-west England was severely flooded following 2 days of almost continuous rain over the nearby hills. Orographic enhancement of the rain through the seeder-feeder mechanism led to the very high rainfall totals. This paper shows the impact of running the Met Office Unified Model (UM) with a grid spacing of 4 and 1 km compared to the 12 km available at the time of the event. These forecasts, and forecasts from the Nimrod nowcasting system, were fed into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other applications of NWP (e.g. Roberts et al, 2009) show that finer resolutions are capable of producing more accurate predictions, and that physics configuration, resolution and initial conditions highly influence the WRF model performance (Kryza et al, 2013). The similarity of results regardless of resolution found in this study may be also related to deficiencies in the parameterisation of the model, or to the inability to sufficiently resolve the topography.…”
Section: Evaluating Precipitation Forecasts From the Wrf Modelmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Other applications of NWP (e.g. Roberts et al, 2009) show that finer resolutions are capable of producing more accurate predictions, and that physics configuration, resolution and initial conditions highly influence the WRF model performance (Kryza et al, 2013). The similarity of results regardless of resolution found in this study may be also related to deficiencies in the parameterisation of the model, or to the inability to sufficiently resolve the topography.…”
Section: Evaluating Precipitation Forecasts From the Wrf Modelmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Roberts et al (2009) noted that the radar data generally had lower rainfall amounts than the gauged network. This study was of the January 2005 Carlisle event, which will be focussed upon within this thesis, and concluded that the rain gauge data provided the most accurate measurements.…”
Section: Subcatchmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This may have been caused by the formation of a sting jet (Browning and Field, 2004), a mesoscale air flow originating in the cloud head of a deepening cyclone and gaining speed as it descends to the tip of the cloud head. Furthermore, orographic enhancement of rainfall occurred due to the seeder-feeder mechanism (Bader and Roach, 1977;Roberts et al, 2009), whereby rain becomes more intense as it falls through lower level clouds formed as moist air flows over mountainous terrain. (Roberts et al 2009) from the Forecasters Reference book (Meteorological Office, 1997) The rarity of the event is linked to its duration, rather than the intensity of the rainfall.…”
Section: Figure 47 Map Showing Storm Track and Areas Affected By Flomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model was used: the probability distributed model (PDM) as described by Moore (2007) and previously applied to a range of flood studies in the UK (e.g. Lamb 1999, Kay et al 2007, Roberts et al 2009). The PDM represents runoff by individual point cylinders whose storage capacity varies across the catchment according to a Pareto probability distribution.…”
Section: Continuous Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%