2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of femur bone density to segregate wild from farmed Dybowski's frog (Rana dybowskii)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age of each frog was determined by the tibiofibula slice procedure as described in Yang et al (2011). 60 frogs (32 males and 28 females) at the age of two years were collected from a frog farm located in the same region (126°29′ E, 44°10′ N, altitude 174 m) where the wild frogs were captured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Age of each frog was determined by the tibiofibula slice procedure as described in Yang et al (2011). 60 frogs (32 males and 28 females) at the age of two years were collected from a frog farm located in the same region (126°29′ E, 44°10′ N, altitude 174 m) where the wild frogs were captured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone structure and density are associated with diet and activity. Animals in the wild tend to be more active than those in the farm; therefore, femur bone density is a stable index useful for discriminating wild and farmed animals (Yang et al 2011). However, these approaches require bones to be isolated from the test animals and are often impracticable for use on live animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third approach proposed in our previous reports was based on the femur, which is very simple to isolate and measure. The major differences between the femurs of farmed and wild Dybowski's frog ( Rana dybowskii ) are the volume density and the ratio of femur length to body mass . These differences result from the fact that wild animals have higher intensity of movements than farmed animals as they search for food and shelter, catch prey, and avoid predators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most terrestrial animals, from amphibians, reptiles, birds to mammals, the movement intensity and diet spectrum are different between the wild and the farmed individuals, which may influence femur morphometric characteristics and density, as indicated in the Dybowski's frog . Thus, it is reasonable to predict that the effectiveness of the femur in segregating wild from farmed frogs is applicable to all terrestrial animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different attempts were made to shed light on the identity of traded species, but to know which species are involved does not necessarily allow conclusions if they were farmed or wild‐caught (Veith, Kosuch, Feldmann, Martens, & Seitz, ). Another promising attempt was measuring femoral bone density, where frogs from captivity show lighter bones (Yang, Huang, Xia, Xu, & Dahmer, ). However, this method is rather complex and difficult to standardize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%