2016
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00745-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: an official ERS statement

Abstract: This document reviews 1) the measurement properties of commonly used exercise tests in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and 2) published studies on their utilty and/or evaluation obtained from MEDLINE and Cochrane Library searches between 1990 and March 2015.Exercise tests are reliable and consistently responsive to rehabilitative and pharmacological interventions. Thresholds for clinically important changes in performance are available for several tests. In pulmonary arterial hypertension, the 6-min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
327
2
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 310 publications
(464 reference statements)
8
327
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of various interventions in relieving activity-related dyspnoea in clinical or research settings, a constant work rate exercise protocol set at a fixed fraction of a pre-established peak work rate (e.g. 60-80%) is preferable [104]. This is justified on the grounds that any beneficial changes in lung mechanics and dyspnoea are more readily translated into increases in time to exercise intolerance (endurance) than changes in maximal exercise capacity [105].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Therapeutic Interventions Using Cpetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of various interventions in relieving activity-related dyspnoea in clinical or research settings, a constant work rate exercise protocol set at a fixed fraction of a pre-established peak work rate (e.g. 60-80%) is preferable [104]. This is justified on the grounds that any beneficial changes in lung mechanics and dyspnoea are more readily translated into increases in time to exercise intolerance (endurance) than changes in maximal exercise capacity [105].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Therapeutic Interventions Using Cpetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though somewhat less popular, the visual analogue scale (VAS) is another dyspnoea-measuring instrument with proven construct validity used during CPET. Both the VAS and Borg scale have been shown to provide similar scores during CPET, and to be reliable and reproducible over time in healthy subjects, and in patients with chronic respiratory diseases undergoing CPET [9]. The advantage of using the Borg or VAS scales in individual patients is the possibility of reliably comparing "intensity of exertional dyspnoea" at the same level of exercise activity (standardised work-rate or oxygen consumption or ventilation during CPET) between subjects, and before and after a pharmacological and/or nonpharmacological treatment [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The advantage of using the Borg or VAS scales in individual patients is the possibility of reliably comparing "intensity of exertional dyspnoea" at the same level of exercise activity (standardised work-rate or oxygen consumption or ventilation during CPET) between subjects, and before and after a pharmacological and/or nonpharmacological treatment [9]. Studies in cardiopulmonary diseases have shown that during CPET, there is a close correlation between the magnitude (and duration) of respiratory effort (measured by tidal oesophageal pressure relative to maximum) and the intensity of dyspnoea (measured by the Borg scale), and that pharmacological manipulations able to reduce the magnitude (and duration) of respiratory effort are clearly and consistently associated with reduced dyspnoea intensity [1,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical protocol for constant work rate testing is instead to start with a 1-3 min warm-up, followed by a workload brusquely increased to a high percentage (usually 75-80%) of that patient's maximal work rate [61]. The constant work test is generally continued to a symptom-limited maximum, and is mainly used for monitoring disease evolution over time and determining responses to pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions [62].…”
Section: The Role Of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test In Ildsmentioning
confidence: 99%