2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of descriptors to define clusters of herds under similar environmental conditions to improve the level of connection among contemporary groups of mutton type merino sheep under an extensive production system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is essential to know genetic associations between the economic importance traits in the reason that they are correlated in magnitude and direction (Sonesson and Meuwissen 2000;Savegnago et al 2011;Porto-Neto et al 2013;Osorio-Avalos et al 2015). Thus, multivariate statistical techniques might generate not possible interpretations if univariate statistics was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is essential to know genetic associations between the economic importance traits in the reason that they are correlated in magnitude and direction (Sonesson and Meuwissen 2000;Savegnago et al 2011;Porto-Neto et al 2013;Osorio-Avalos et al 2015). Thus, multivariate statistical techniques might generate not possible interpretations if univariate statistics was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding sires, the increase was 5.1 % (herd-cluster test day) and 5.7 % (herd-cluster test month). Hence, the detailed consideration of environmental conditions and herd characteristics contributed to an increase of EBV reliabilities in the range from 3 % to 6 %, reflecting the postulations by Zwald et al (2003) and Osorio-Avalos et al (2015). The herd cluster instead of the herd effect for the CG modeling contributed to increased heritability estimates from 0.23 (herd-test-day effect and herd-test-month effect, respectively) to 0.36 (herdcluster-test-day effect) or to 0.38 (herd-cluster-test-month effect).…”
Section: Impact Of Herd Clustering On Genetic Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the herd effect when modeling CGs is not constant throughout the year, implying consideration of a further time-dependent explanatory variable, i.e., via herd-year-season or herd-test-day modeling (Emmerling, 2000). However, such modeling approaches might be problematic in the case of small herd sizes, implying only a few cow records per CG, with detrimental impact on selection accuracy (Strabel et al, 2005;Pereira et al, 2018). Furthermore, human-animal relationships reflecting social characteristics determine herd effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cluster is a grouping procedure that may be attractive for defining herds under similar environmental conditions (Weigel and Rekaya 2000), which have been recently integrated using climate, management and productive variables (environmental descriptors), allowing the identification with greater clarity of environmental levels (Osorio-Avalos et al 2015), making the characterization of the production systems of a region and/or country more reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%