1995
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00219-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of certainty of opinion data to enhance clinical decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphical presentation of PPR and NPR could prove to be an efficient teaching tool, based on an approach that has been developed by Johnson [31]. As suggested by Walter et al [32], the "assumption of a binary disease state is unrealistic in much of the clinical practice." The utility of the new measures in nonbinary situations should be explored in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphical presentation of PPR and NPR could prove to be an efficient teaching tool, based on an approach that has been developed by Johnson [31]. As suggested by Walter et al [32], the "assumption of a binary disease state is unrealistic in much of the clinical practice." The utility of the new measures in nonbinary situations should be explored in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses were analyzed using standardized tabulations—descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic variables, and percentages were used to summarize categorical data. As has been done previously, 12 for simplicity, we chose to present the data from the Likert scale (strongly agree AND agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree AND strongly disagree) and frequency of endorsement questions (<5% AND 5%–25%; 26%–50% AND 51%–75%; 76%–95% AND >95%), grouped into three categories. This decision was driven by the distribution of the data and ease of interpretation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%