2015
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a risk quiz to predict infection for sexually transmitted infections: a retrospective analysis of acceptability and positivity

Abstract: Background Individuals who are sexually active may want to make a decision as to whether they are at risk for having a sexually transmitted infection (STI) such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis. Our goal was to develop and evaluate a simple self-taken sexual risk quiz for participants, ordering an online STI self-collection test kit to determine whether the score predicted infection status. Methods As part of the IWantTheKit programme for home sample self-collection f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall sexual risk during recent sex was measured through six questions previously used to assess sexual risk among adolescents via an Internet site (Chai et al, 2010; Gaydos et al, 2015; Gaydos et al, 2009). These questions included items related to number and frequency of sexual partners, history of STI diagnosis, and condom use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall sexual risk during recent sex was measured through six questions previously used to assess sexual risk among adolescents via an Internet site (Chai et al, 2010; Gaydos et al, 2015; Gaydos et al, 2009). These questions included items related to number and frequency of sexual partners, history of STI diagnosis, and condom use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were classified as having low (score=0–2) or high (score=3–9) risk during recent sex by summing risk scores across the six questions. The majority of participants in this study were classified as high-risk, so to ensure a sufficient number of observations within sexual risk categories, this measure was dichotomized at a cut-off chosen based on prior work (Gaydos et al, 2015; Gaydos et al, 2009). A composite sexual risk score, rather than an examination of specific risky behaviors, was used for this analysis because YBSSAM may be engaging in multiple risky behaviors, and this study sought to explore overall current sexual risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative, non-clinic based alternatives to traditional sexual health screening and treatment are essential for alleviating these sexual health disparities. Promotion of self-care, or the care taken by individuals towards their own health and well-being may be such a strategy; it is endorsed for improving sexual health outcomes by increasing access to care and individual satisfaction with care through client-driven, confidential options [4, 1216]. Improving sexual health though the promotion of self-care is increasingly a focus of preventing sexual health disparities due to: 1) increased availability of new technologies, 2) the ease of STI screening using non-invasive samples, and 3) the lack of capacity for routine sexual health care service provision common in many reservation-based and other rural communities [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participating women were mostly between 18 and 30 years of age (63.7%, 95% CI: 54.4–73.1; Table 1). Results of a risk quiz on the website indicating probability for having an STI 3,4 demonstrated that the majority (71.6%, 95% CI: 62.8–80.3) had a risk score in the intermediate risk category (5–7) and high risk category (8–10), based on a point system of 0–10 (Table 1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%